Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 7;98(23):e15841. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015841

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Incremental cost-effectiveness 95% confidence interval ellipse, exclusive formula feeding (EFF) versus exclusive breastfeeding (EBF). This figure presents the uncertainty of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) generated by this model using the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, with the red dot depicting the base case ICER estimate. The diagonal WTP line denotes the maximum acceptable ICER at an assumed WTP of $10,000. Estimates above this line indicate that EFF is costlier and less effective than EBF, thus EBF is the more cost-effective strategy (as is the case here). Conversely, estimates below this line would indicate that EFF is less costly and more effective, which would deem EFF as the more cost-effective strategy in comparison to EBF.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure