Table 1.
Mean knockdown time (KT) in minutes for populations of adult Tribolium castaneum assayed as single beetles or as groups of 10 for knockdown of 50% or 100% of the group.
Population 1 & Resistance Status |
FAO % Resist. 2 |
Single KT (± SE) 3,4,5 | 50% KT (± SE) 3,4,5 | 100% KT (± SE) 3,4,5 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Susceptible | ||||||||||
USDA Lab Susceptible | 0 | 8.46 | ± | 0.66 A,a | 5.19 | ± | 0.21 A,b | 9.13 | ± | 0.46 A,a |
Excelsior Springs | 0 | 10.82 | ± | 1.04 A,a | 6.13 | ± | 0.48 A,a | 17.05 | ± | 3.01 AB,b |
Calgary, Alberta | 0 | 9.24 | ± | 0.42 A,a | 7.27 | ± | 0.11 A,a | 16.23 | ± | 1.21 AB,b |
Davis, Calif. | 0 | 14.13 | ± | 0.84 AB,a | 9.16 | ± | 0.84 AB,a | 34.83 | ± | 7.42 AB,b |
Arbuckle, Calif. | 0 | 14.37 | ± | 1.35 AB,a | 10.00 | ± | 0.30 B,a | 31.28 | ± | 3.12 AB,b |
Williams, Calif. | 0 | 10.91 | ± | 1.01 A,a | 10.05 | ± | 0.53 B,a | 26.16 | ± | 2.15 AB,b |
Weak Resistance | ||||||||||
Thailand | 15 | 14.62 | ± | 2.00 AB,a | 7.89 | ± | 0.29 AB,a | 29.17 | ± | 3.92 AB,b |
Abilene, Kansas | 39 | 16.14 | ± | 1.21 AB,a | 11.50 | ± | 0.61 BC,a | 37.30 | ± | 3.84 AB,b |
Russell, Kansas | 41 | 16.82 | ± | 1.38 AB,a | 14.38 | ± | 0.42 CD,a | 62.78 | ± | 9.12 BC,b |
Strong Resistance | ||||||||||
Minneapolis, Kansas | 89 | 24.47 | ± | 2.35 B,a | 16.98 | ± | 1.04 D,a | 100.20 | ± | 11.77 C,b |
Mitchell, Kansas | 93 | 19.32 | ± | 1.54 AB,a | 14.55 | ± | 0.87 CD,a | 172.15 | ± | 24.72 D,b |
Red Level, Alabama | 100 | 52.70 | ± | 1.54 AB,a | 24.33 | ± | 2.05 E,a | 194.13 | ± | 22.13 D,b |
1 Name/location of each population tested and its resistance status as per Cato et al. [8]. 2 Percent of beetles in a population estimated to be phosphine-resistant determined in a recent FAO test [8]. 3 Replications per KT type as follows: Single (10), KT50 (5), and KT100 (5). 4 Means for KT results in a row followed by the same lower case letter, and those in a column followed by the same upper case letter, are not significantly different according to a Tukey HSD post hoc analysis, p < 0.05. 5 All differences were determined by a Two-Way ANOVA, F = 8.416, df = 22, 204, p < 0.01.