Table 4.
Authors | Study Year | Sample Size | Age | Gender | Intervention | Main findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pyka et al. [107] | 1992 | 11 versus 12 younger controls | 72 ± 0.8 y | Male (n = 6) and female (n = 5) | 3 sets of 8 repetitions for each of the 12 exercises, at 70% of 1RM values | Growth hormone response to resistance exercise abolished/diminished in elderly subjects |
Cearlock and Nuzzo [108] | 2001 | 9 versus 16 younger controls | 60–85 y | Female | 4-week exercise program followed by 1 w of no exercise | No changes |
Banitalebi et al. [74] | 2018 | 40 (12 of which serving as controls) | 67.35 ± 1.40 y | Female | Randomized allocation to a resistance followed by endurance training program (n = 12), endurance training followed by resistance training (n = 12), interval resistance-endurance training (n = 12) groups | No changes |
Abbreviations: RM (repetition maximum); w (week); y (years).