Skip to main content
. 2019 May 13;8(5):670. doi: 10.3390/jcm8050670

Table 4.

Cumulative revision and differences by hospital volume of procedures by year in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). RACat 2005–2016.

Time (in Years) At Risk Revisions Cum. Failure (95% CI) SHR (95% CI)
Lower volume 1.00
1 16,594 112 0.64 (0.53–0.77)
5 9,064 366 3.24 (2.96–3.53)
10 1,217 80 4.66 (4.21–5.13)
Higher volume 1.29 (1.16–1.44)
1 16,293 202 1.15 (1.00–1.32)
5 8,673 422 4.17 (3.85–4.50)
10 744 89 5.84 (5.33–6.39)

At risk: Number of primary procedures at the beginning of the period. Revisions: Number of revision procedures during the period; cum. failure: Cumulative failure; (95% CI): 95% confidence interval. SHR: Subhazard ratio for the hospital volume (Lower volume as reference category) adjusted for sex, age, comorbidity (from Elixhauser index), year of intervention and type of fixation.