Skip to main content
Molecules logoLink to Molecules
. 2019 May 15;24(10):1877. doi: 10.3390/molecules24101877

Geographic Differences in Element Accumulation in Needles of Aleppo Pines (Pinus halepensis Mill.) Grown in Mediterranean Region

Michaela Zeiner 1,2,*, Ana Kuhar 3, Iva Juranović Cindrić 3
Editors: Giuseppe Scarponi, Silvia Illuminati, Anna Annibaldi, Cristina Truzzi
PMCID: PMC6572550  PMID: 31096695

Abstract

Pine needles are widely used as bio-indicators due to their worldwide distribution and the ease of sample collection. In contrast to deciduous trees, conifers offer the possibility of monitoring long-term exposure through older needles. Pinus halepensis Miller is a pine species native to the Mediterranean region, which has been used for restoration activities in arid and semiarid areas leading to vast spatial expansion. Needles from pine trees collected in the southeastern to northwestern extension of Croatia’s coastal area at twelve sampling sites were analysed for twenty-one metals and metalloids. Statistical evaluation of the obtained data revealed significant differences for Al, As, B, Ba, Ca, Cr, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na, Se, and Sr between the different regions. Needles from trees growing on islands did not show elevated levels of Mg and/or Na as a result of the sea spray influence. The differences in metal accumulation are supposed to be linked to the environmental conditions at the respective sampling site, since the species was the same everywhere. By comparing the elemental contents of the soil those of with needles, it can be clearly seen, that the root as well as the foliar uptake contribute to the final amount.

Keywords: alepski bor, Aleppo pine, geographical distribution, ICP-AES, ICP-MS, element content, pine needles

1. Introduction

The Aleppo pine (Pinus halepensis Miller) named after the city Aleppo in Syria is a pine species originating from arid and semiarid areas in the Mediterranean region. Miller describes this pine species as follows: “PINUS (Halepensis) foliis geminis tenuissimis, conis obtusis, ramis patulis. [...] Pine-tree with two narrow leaves in each sheath, obtuse cones, and spreading branches. Pinus Halepensis, foliis tenuibus lætè viridibus. […] Aleppo Pine with very narrow dark green leaves.” [1] The tree is small to medium-sized; its slender, light green needles can reach a length up to 12 cm. The reproduction takes place via distribution of seeds by wind and birds. [2] Recent studies have shown that Pinus halepensis is a valuable medical plant. Its essential oil has been proven to exhibit nootropic and neuroprotective activities, which supports the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease [3]. Powder of Aleppo needles can be successfully applied to heal skin burns [4]. Extracts of bark, cones and seeds exhibit antibacterial activity [5].

Besides the natural occurrence, this tree has been widely used for reforestation purposes in the 19th and 20th centuries [6,7]. Such plantations are aimed to reduce degradation of (semi)arid areas caused by climatic changes and anthropogenic influences. Especially this pine species, characterised by high-resistance to adverse climatic and soil conditions, is highly estimated as a pioneer species to protect soils against desertification [7]. Consequence of this prevalence of Pinus halepensis in afforestation is a vast spatial expansion of this tree, in some parts even with a growth rate of 600% per year [6]. Besides the positive effects of these plantations on soil properties [8], the invasive character of Aleppo pine showed negative effects on floral and faunal biodiversity alongside changes in the hydrological system [6,7]. Due to its distribution along the Croatian coastline, the locally called alepski bor seems to be a good representative plant for studying geographical differences in metal accumulation. Furthermore, Aleppo pines have only been scarcely used in monitoring studies regarding metal accumulation in needles [9,10], data that are more recent are available for tree rings [11,12] or for bark [11,12,13].

Plants or plant parts are widely used for investigating environmental pollution coming from soil, water and/or air. Mosses are found to be more efficient than conifer needles for air quality monitoring [14]. Nevertheless, conifer and especially pine needles present good bio-indicators in environmental monitoring, not only for organic [15], but also for inorganic pollutants [16], whereby various parameters influence the final quantified amount of a metal in the respective specimen. The impact from the growing area must be considered [17], which depends on the local climatic conditions, the soil composition and the respective pollution [18]. Furthermore, characteristics of the tree, for instance its age [19], species and/or hybridisation [20] determine the needle metal contents. Conversely, soil properties—such as acidity—are changed by the pine trees themselves, which subsequently has an impact on the bioavailability and root uptake of certain metals [21].

Apart from the negative impact on plants by metals coming from various pollution sources, certain elements are required for a proper functioning of the plants’ physiology and thus essential nutrients [22].

Thus, the presented investigation covers the following 21 metals and metalloids: aluminium, arsenic, boron, barium, calcium, cadmium, cobalt, copper, chromium, iron, potassium, lithium, magnesium, manganese, molybdenum, sodium, nickel, lead, selenium, strontium, and zinc (plant nutrients according to Plank and Kissel [22] in italic). Regarding the geographical differences to be studied, twelve sampling sites were chosen along the Croatian coastline from northwest down to southeast

2. Results

The analytical method used has been proven to be fit for purpose. The figures of merit of both methods, such as recoveries to show the trueness, precision and day-to-day-repeatability to see the influence of random errors are given besides the instrumental conditions in Table 1.

Table 1.

Instrumental conditions and figures of merit for both analytical methods used.

Parameter ICP-AES 1 ICP-SFMS 2
Instrument Prodigy High Dispersive ICP-AES (Teledyne Leeman, Hudson, NH, USA) Element 2 ICP-SFMS (Thermo Fisher; Bremen, Germany)
Output power 1100 W 1300 W
Argon flows Coolant:18 L min−1 Coolant: 16 L min−1
Auxiliary: 0.8 L min−1 Auxiliary: 0.86 L min−1
Nebuliser: 1 L min−1 Nebuliser: 1.06 L min−1
Sample flow 1.0 mL min−1 100 μL min−1
Nebuliser Pneumatic (glass concentric) PFA microflow
Spray chamber Glass cyclonic PC3 cyclonic quartz chamber
Plasma viewing Axial -------
Analytes Al at 396.152 nm 3 75As+ (HR) 4
98Mo+ (MR)
7Li+ (LR)
82Se+ (LR)
111Cd+ (LR)
208Pb+ (LR)
115In+ (internal standard at 1.1 µg/L for all resolution levels)
B at 208.956 nm
Ba at 455.403 nm
Ca at 396.847 nm
Cd at 214.441 nm
Co at 228.615 nm
Cr at 267.716 nm
Cu at 224.700 nm
Fe at 238.204 nm
K at 766.491 nm
Mg at 280.271 nm
Mn at 257.610 nm
Mo at 202.030 nm
Na at 589.592 nm
Ni at 231.604 nm
Pb at 220.353 nm
Sr at 407.771 nm
Zn at 213.856 nm
Recovery 92%–115% 90%–111%
Precision (RSD) 0.07%–2.3% 0.1%–2.1%
Day-to-day repeatability <2.9% <2.7%

1 inductively coupled atomic emission spectrometry. 2 inductively coupled sector field plasma mass spectrometry. 3 wavelengths obtained by line selection for the given matrix. 4 HR, high resolution; MR, medium resolution; LR, low resolution with the nominal mass resolutions being 350, 4500 and 10,000.

All obtained calibration curves had coefficients of determination (R2) higher than 0.999. The determined LOQs are listed in Table 2 alongside the results of the elemental contents in the analysed pine needles. Each sampling site was considered as one population; the respective means were tested by ANOVA for significant differences. Statistically significant dependency of the elemental needle contents on the sampling site (p < 0.05) was found for thirteen of the investigated twenty one analytes, namely Al, As, B, Ba, Ca, Cr, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na, Se, and Sr. The content ranges of each sampling site as well as the p-values from the ANOVA-tests are given in Table 3.

Table 2.

Elemental contents in Aleppo pine needles for all sampling sites in mg/kg dry matter alongside literature data.

Element Method LOQ Mean Min Max SD RSD in % Amman City Jordan [9] Catalonia (Spain) [10]
Aluminium AES 2.9 249 32.7 1,000 184 135 376–1150
Arsenic MS 0.058 0.244 <LOD 2.06 0.411 59 0.0229–0.180
Boron AES 1.0 35.4 LOD < x < LOQ 99.2 23.5 150
Barium AES 1.1 6.28 <LOD 33.0 6.11 103
Calcium AES 0.42 4975 1231 16147 3449 144
Cadmium MS 0.0017 0.419 0.020 6.16 1.28 33 0.12–1.50 0.0152–0.186
Cobalt MS 0.011 1.44 0.018 10.0 3.25 44
Chromium MS 0.023 1.26 0.063 10.8 2.21 57 0.113–0.756
Copper MS 0.022 5.27 1.01 52.7 6.81 77 5.32–16.0 3.363–14.463
Iron AES 0.19 146 32.9 461 118 124
Potassium AES 0.84 3123 548 6052 1663 188
Lithium MS 0.027 2.00 0.128 20.7 4.53 44
Magnesium AES 0.61 2081 640 3310 690 302
Manganese AES 0.87 21.2 6.18 39.5 8.97 236
Molybdenum AES 0.13 5.74 0.414 48.8 6.43 89
Sodium AES 0.20 1431 187 6291 1622 88
Nickel MS 0.019 0.994 0.0574 8.01 1.83 54 0.260–2.588
Lead MS 0.043 3.03 0.0567 25.0 5.79 52 11.0–75.5 0.469–3.179
Selenium MS 0.016 0.653 0.0634 1.72 0.404 161
Strontium AES 0.17 6.86 1.63 15.5 3.88 177
Zinc AES 1.1 27.0 2.23 543 67.8 40 10.0–118 20.204–29.162

Table 3.

Ranges of elemental contents in Aleppo pine needles for the individual sampling sites in mg/kg dry matter alongside p-value of ANOVA-test (elements written in italic means statistically significant difference between the sampling sites).

Element Bol na Braču Dugi Otok Mareda-Istra Marjana Pakoštane Petrčane Pirovac Poreč Starigrad Vis Vodice Zaton p-value 1
Aluminium 156–264 32.7–1000 193–314 50.4–106 84.4–343 174–705 80.9–82.2 142–240 347–528 112–652 112–156 108–517 1.3 × 10−16
Arsenic 0.0528–0.0665 <LOD–0.481 0.0521–0.0638 0.0736–0.0778 0.0480–0.300 0.104–0.204 0.0136–0.0703 0.954–2.06 0.0809–0.301 0.218–0.235 0.0394–1.28 0.0167–0.804 0.00059
Boron 13.0–14.7 15.7–99.2 <LOD <LOD 24.5–38.2 35.9–55.1 17.3–21.8 24.9–33.8 0.967–46.7 14.0–39.3 16.6–17.2 13.7–67.3 0.015
Barium 5.30–7.40 0.0985–14.4 10.7–13.3 3.00–4.55 1.35–6.48 4.14–7.92 1.34–1.74 5.13–7.20 7.34–33.0 3.16–5.69 4.70–9.68 1.69–6.21 1.9 × 10−6
Calcium 7824–8528 1980–6612 15733–16147 7477–8127 2915–3710 1231–6264 2710–3154 2263–8013 1858–3238 5011–60122 8560–10567 4980–7656 1.3 × 10−16
Cadmium 0.115–0.141 0.0207–0.264 0.131–0.140 0.0197–0.0635 0.0605–0.145 0.134–0.225 0.117–0.165 0.112–0.134 0.162–6.16 0.0383–0.0918 0.0376–0.0992 0.0616–0.854 0.055
Cobalt <LOD–0.0191 0.0198–5.86 <LOD <LOD 0.0402–0.159 0.0671–0.134 0.0183–0.0969 <LOD 0.0572–10.0 <LOD <LOD–0.0395 0.150–0.631 0.46
Chromium 0.555–1.29 0.219–0.807 0.553–0.620 0.0635–0.690 0.418–1.43 0.582–1.42 0.532–0.914 0.438–0.935 0.910–10.8 0.174–0.498 0.357–0.615 0.554–2.47 0.015
Copper 2.24–4.29 1.69–7.14 1.68–4.03 3.73–5.56 2.58–6.49 2.62–4.06 3.10–4.29 2.84–4.58 1.94–13.7 1.49–8.11 1.01–2.63 1.50–10.3 0.44
Iron 68.4–91.0 32.9–86.7 134–143 45.5–48.8 62.5–169 151–170 74.7–96.8 99.0–172 263–417 65.3–72.1 62.8–92.8 105–461 7.0 × 10−10
Potassium 2826–2953 647–4457 690–1450 3723–3929 3627–4437 548–4396 4844–5080 783–4785 611–4202 1956–2021 3340–6830 2590–6052 0.00089
Lithium 0.543–0.602 0.128–0.638 0.334–0.564 0.182–0.313 0.241–2.65 1.39–2.50 0.190–0.976 4.20–4.88 0.557–1.02 1.16–1.50 0.125 –0.251 0.159–2.67 0.63
Magnesium 2756–2866 1623–3310 1683–2770 2817–3047 1940–2936 1566–1902 1313–1331 1285–1913 1444–1638 2534–3095 3288–4158 640–2756 5.1 × 10−5
Manganese 31.7–39.5 26.3–36.7 17.7–22.7 6.18–6.33 14.7–19.2 15.6–20.9 10.6–13.8 15.0–15.3 11.2–30.3 12.1–12.8 21.7–23.9 7.93–34.2 3.1 × 10−8
Molybdenum 3.68–5.09 0.414–7.35 2.58–4.20 3.80–4.89 3.57–7.36 1.09–4.80 2.66–48.8 4.51–7.58 2.37–16.2 1.87–7.49 2.02–5.42 3.43–10.8 0.093
Sodium 924–971 404–1380 1374–1565 187–236 352–1093 4826–5731 711–777 472–870 585–2143 444–598 708–866 1732–6291 1.1 × 10−11
Nickel 0.0765–0.301 0.259–2.81 0.363–0.700 0.212–0.987 0.198–0.842 0.113–0.241 0.0778–1.16 0.358–0.411 0.303–8.01 0.0574–0.496 0.113–0.415 0.408–1.35 0.22
Lead <LOD 0.0969–7.25 <LOD 0.212–25.0 <LOD 0.246–0.443 0.116–13.5 <LOD–0.0954 0.184–11.5 <LOD –0.0574 <LOD 0.0567–1.03 0.65
Selenium 0.539–0.682 0.152–0.565 0.317–0.369 1.23–1.24 0.355–1.46 0.649–1.52 0.272–0.878 0.448–0.657 0.503–0.689 0.776–0.955 <LOD–0.0634 0.0800–1.72 0.035
Strontium 7.01–7.64 1.63–8.04 9.70–10.2 5.25–5.42 3.71–5.78 10.2–15.5 2.44–2.90 10.3–11.9 10.8–11.5 5.34–6.41 5.53–7.95 3.53–15.2 1.1 × 10−8
Zinc 15.2–18.2 2.23–32.6 16.3–18.2 10.9–17.3 16.5–30.4 12.2–60.5 17.3–41.7 11.8–13.4 10.6–29.4 30.3–37.6 11.4–13.5 11.3–18.9 0.99

1p-values from Kruskal–Wallis-Test: Al 0.004; As < 0.001; B 0.012; Ba < 0.0001; Ca < 0.0001; Cd 0.128; Co 0.112; Cr < 0.0001; Cu 0.394; Fe < 0.0001; K 0.014; Li 0.196; Mg 0.0003; Mn < 0.0001; Mo 0.163; Na < 0.0001; Ni 0.18; Pb 0.539; Se 0.056; Sr < 0.0001; and Zn 0.08.

3. Discussion

3.1. Metal Needle Contents for Pinus halepensis

The chosen plant species Pinus halepensis is wide spread along the Croatian coastline, thus it fulfils basic criteria for a plant being used as bio-monitor, namely being represented in large numbers all over the monitoring area besides the easy and economic sampling procedure [23]. The analytical method applied was optimised for the given matrix and the obtained figures of merit were considered acceptable. This conclusion was drawn based on the validation parameters determined, i.e., trueness (expressed as recovery in %), precision (expressed as relative standard deviation - RSD), and day-to-day-repeatability (in %), LOQ (in mg/kg dry matrix) as well as coefficients of determination of the respective calibration curves (data are listed in Table 1 and Table 2 and mentioned in Section 2—results). Since the recoveries obtained were all around 100%, no significant interferences by the matrix is to be expected, meaning that there is no need for matrix-matched standards. The ICP-SFMS employed in the present study is specified for R = 4500 in medium resolution, and R = 11,000 in high resolution. Since spectral separation of 40Ar35Cl+ from 75As+ requires a minimum resolution of 7770, we have set the instrument to high resolution for measuring As. Furthermore, chloride is always present in digested plant samples leading to an overestimation of As if not properly resolved. Even if sensitivity at high resolution settings is lower than in medium resolution, the limit of detection is not significantly increased due to the lower background and lower background fluctuation.

Furthermore, to ensure trueness of the results, washing of the needles after sampling was performed carefully. Plant material offers the possibility to monitor elements that are naturally occurring as well as resulting from pollution in the environment depending on time and place. Origin of the metals and metalloids found in the needles is on the one hand given by root uptake from soil and on the other hand via uptake through the stomata on the needle surface. Aerial deposition of metals caused by anthropogenic activity is especially high in industrial areas and near roads. In order to exclude the metals only attached to the needle surface from those taken up, needles have to be washed prior to sample preparation to avoid falsification of the results [9].

Even if Pinus helapensis is highly abundant in the Mediterranean area and its applicability as a bio-indicator in arid environments has been previously demonstrated [9], few studies have been published dealing with the inorganic needle composition. Data for comparison to the obtained results from the presented study are given in Table 2. The investigation by the Jordanian working group covered only four potentially toxic metals, namely cadmium, copper, lead and zinc [9]. Of all these metals, the contents ranged wider for the Croatian trees than those from Jordan. In this respect, it must be considered that the latter study focused on Amman city and its surroundings, whereas the present paper describes sampling sites along the entire Croatian coastline. With the exception of lead, the contents found are comparable. Higher amounts for lead in the Jordanian needles can be explained by the fact, that leaded petrol was the predominant fuel used by automobiles at the time when the sampling was carried out. The publication by the Catalonian research group includes eight metals, the former four and additionally aluminium, arsenic, chromium and nickel [10]. The results found in this study are in the same order of magnitude, but as stated above the ranges are larger, which can be explained by the wider sampling area. For As, Cd, and Cr the obtained mean content for all the trees in all of the sampling sites is beyond the upper end of the ranges determined for the Spanish Aleppo pine needles. Conversely, for Al the mean is below the lower end of the range for the Catalonian samples [10].

Comparing the elemental contents of the data in needles of Pinus halepensis with those of other pine species has to be treated with care, since each species shows different accumulation behaviour, even when grown under the same conditions [24,25]. In general, the results for the major elements, determined by the soil background composition, such as Ca, K, Mg, and Na are always in the g/kg range, whereas the other elements studied are present in the µg/kg to mg/kg range (trace and ultra-trace elements).

3.2. Geographical Differences

Arsenic is not only a pollutant given by anthropologenic activity, but also its distribution in soils of agricultural and grazing land is directly related to the underlying geology [26]. Thus, it is not surprising that As is one of the elements whose needle contents differ statistically significantly between the different regions. An overview map on As distribution in European top soils shows the As levels close to sampling site 8 (Poreč) to be the highest. This fact is reflected in the highest As needle contents found for this area (see Table 3). Conversely, a geochemical survey from 2005 showed similar As contents in top and sub soil for the whole country Croatia [27]. In this respect, it must be considered that pine tree roots reach deeper soil horizons and not only the top layer, which has been analysed in the soil survey [26] and furthermore that the dry and wet precipitation also contribute to the metal uptake. Differences in needle and soil contents can easily be seen by plotting As content in needles versus the needle contents of two important soil background elements, namely Ca and Fe (see Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Correlation of needle contents of selected soil background elements: (a) Fe vs. As; and (b) Ca vs. As.

Regarding Cd in Croatian top soils, an unequal distribution has been found, with higher values towards the south [28,29]. However, this tendency was less significant in the investigation from 2005 [27]. The resultant accumulation of Cd in the pine needles does not differ statistically significant. Neither for the environmental pollutants Ni and Pb statistically significant difference in the needle contents were found. Furthermore, for these two elements, the soil levels vary throughout the sampled region [27,28]. Similar findings were reached for Co, an element being associated to Ni.

The main rock forming elements, such as Al, Ca, K, Fe, Mg, and Na, were found in the needles in geographically dependent contents. In addition, they all display unequal distribution along the Croatian coastline [28], whereby the variation in the soil content differs from the variation in the needle content. Comparing samples from the island with those from the mainland, no spray influence resulting in higher Na and/or Mg contents could be found, as having been reported for needles from Pinus canariensis growing on the Atlantic island Tenerife [30].

The dispersal of flysch zones in the coastal region causes increased strontium soil concentrations, the highest being registered in the interior of Istria [28]. According to this information presented in the geochemical atlas of Croatia by Halamić, highest Sr needles contents are to be expected in the samples from the sampling sites 4 (Marjana), 5 (Pakoštane), 6 (Petrčane), and 7 (Pirovac), which are only given for the Petrčane area. Furthermore, the results for sampling site 3 (Mareda) and 8 (Poreč), which are located on the peninsula Istria, but not in its inner part, are among the highest found in the presented study. Thus, it is assumed that not only the soil composition alone affects the trees’ metal uptake, but also that spreading of certain elements via wind has to be considered.

Barium, especially present in igneous rocks, becomes bioavailable due to weathering processes. In the coastal areas, the soil contents are lower than in the inner part of Croatia. Some islands in the South, such as Brač, Hvar, Korčula and Mlijet, also have elevated Ba content [28]. Despite this element presenting statistically significantly differences between the sampling sites, this trend is not directly reflected in the obtained data.

Chromium, being considered an indicator for basic soil, was found to be present in highest soil level close to Starigrad [28]. The samples with the highest Cr needle contents were collected in this area.

The abundance of the chalcophile trace element Copper is associated with other transitional elements, e.g., As, Co, Cr, Fe, and Ni. Copper in (agricultural) soil is mainly of anthropogenic origin, especially in areas with apple or vine cultivation. Within Croatia, the highest soil Cu levels are found in the coastal region, with an increasing tendency towards south. [28] Maximum Cu content in needles was found for Starigrad (sampling site 9; 13.7 mg/kg), this area having also the highest mean value of all regions studied (6.43 mg/kg), followed by Zaton and Vis (sampling sites 12 and 10; max. 10.3 mg/kg and 8.11 mg/kg, resp.). The high variance within each area led to no statistically significant difference between the sampling spots.

For Manganese, the geochemical atlas of Croatia shows the highest soil contents in central Dalmatia close to sampling sites 7 (Pirovac) and 11 (Vodice), as well as 9 (Starigrad) and 12 (Zaton) [28]. The needle samples from the latter three contained high quantities of Mn, but even less than those from Dugi Otok (sampling site 2) and Bol na Braču (sampling site 1). By comparing Cu with Mn, it can be seen that the variance within the different areas are smaller for the latter, so the values for each area significantly different from each other.

According to Halamić and colleagues [28], increased zinc soil concentrations are characteristic for the Velebit Mountain seaside and the whole central and southern Dalmatia, whereby higher amounts are present in their hinterland than in the coastal area, alongside island Vis. For this place (sampling site) the highest zinc needle contents were found. Otherwise, the results are quite similar resulting in non-statistically significant differences.

The abundance of Li in soil varies. The element has been reported to be present in higher concentrations in arid soils. Lithium in the environment has not been studied to a great extent, due to its low toxicity to plants and animals, but the increasing use and resultant disposal of Li-containing products, e.g., batteries, makes this element worth investigating [31]. The geochemical atlas of Croatia does not cover Lithium. The needle Li content does not differ statistically significantly between the sampling sites. The highest values were found for sampling site 8 (Poreč; >4 mg/kg), followed by Zaton (sampling site 12; max. 2.67 mg/kg), Pakoštane (sampling site 5; max. 2.64 mg/kg), and Petrčane (sampling site 6; max. 2.50 mg/kg).

Boron, being an essential element for plants, is widely distributed in the environment, in both hydrosphere and lithosphere [32]. Its needle contents vary widely, from not detectable values (below LOD) up to 99 mg/kg. Not only does this trend apply to the different areas, but also within the single sampling sites, such as in Zaton (sampling site 12), Dugi Otok (sampling site 2) and Starigrad (sampling site 9) large ranges were found.

Selenium is another element, with paucity of data for Croatian soils. For its importance in sheep fodder, it was studied along with soil analysis in Slavonia and Barania in the eastern part of the country, but not covering the coastal areas [33]. As for boron, statistically significant differences were found, but within each sampling sites, the contents do not vary widely.

Regarding molybdenum, all determined needle contents are considered to belong to one group of data, no statistically significant differences based on the geographical origin of the samples was found. The Mo soil levels are considered relatively high in Croatia due to the long weathering history of karstic residual soils [34].

3.3. Pinus halepensis as Medicinal Plant

Aleppo pines are used as medicinal plants for various applications. The most common ones are based on using powder of Aleppo needles, extracts of bark, cones and seeds besides its essential oil. Thus, the present amounts of potentially toxic metals for the plant parts of interest are regulated by the WHO document “Quality control methods for medicinal plant materials” [35]. Limit values are stated for Cd and Pb with 0.3 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg, respectively. Exceedances of these quantities were found for three trees from sampling site 9 (Starigrad), for both Cd and Pb. Furthermore, one tree from sampling site 12 (Zaton) contained more Cd than allowed; 0.85 mg/kg. Pb, besides the above-mentioned exceeding, one tree from Marjana (sampling site 4) and one from Pirovac (sampling site 7), had a high needle content, 25 mg/kg and 13 mg/kg, respectively. Overall, 8.3% of all analysed trees (n = 60) are not appropriate for medical use regarding Pb and 6.7% referring to Cd. Thus, their application in general seems to be safe, but it has to be taken into account that for other potentially toxic elements, such as As, Cu, or Ni no maximum contents are stipulated.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Samples

The sampling was carried out in autumn 2012. Trees of Pinus halepensis from twelve different sampling spots were sampled (see Figure 2), whereby always fully developed 1-year-old pine needles were taken from the external and sunlit part of the crown. The age of the trees ranged from 20 years to 30 years. The number of sampled trees ranged from three to fourteen, the data are given in Figure 2. The collected needles of each tree were pooled for further sample preparation.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Location of the twelve sampling sites for pine needles in coastal area of Croatia.

4.2. Chemicals and Glass/Plastic-ware

Nitric acid (HNO3) of p.a. (pro analysis) quality and the ICP Multielement Standard IV (1000 mg/L) were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). The latter was used to prepare the calibrations standards in the concentration ranges from 0.05 mg/L to 5.0 mg/L for ICP-AES, and from 0.01 µg/L to 100 μg/L for ICP-MS. Measurements for validation purposes were carried out with the standard reference material SRM 1575a—Trace Elements in Pine Needles—obtained from National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, USA.

All glass- and plastic-ware intended for use were pre-cleaned with semi-concentrated nitric acid. Ultrapure water (>18 MΩ* cm) was produced in-house.

4.3. Sample Preparation

All pooled needle samples from each tree were rinsed with ultra-pure water and then brought to constant weight by drying in a laboratory oven at 105 °C. Afterwards, the dried samples were homogenised and ground using a metal-free mortar. Three aliquots with a mass ranging from 0.045 g to 0.075 g, weighed to the nearest 0.1 mg, were taken of each dried pooled needles sample for acid microwave assisted digestion. To each vessel with powdered needles, 5 mL of semi-concentrated HNO3 (7 mol/L) were added. The used instrument, a MWS-2 Microwave System Speedwave BERGHOF (Eningen, Germany), ran the following temperature program for digestion: step 1: 150 °C for 10 min, step 2: 160 °C for 10 min and step 3: 190 °C for 20 min. The obtained clear digest solutions were subsequently filled up to a final volume of 10.0 mL with ultrapure water. The SRM as well as the blank solutions underwent the same treatment.

4.4. Measurements

Elemental concentrations in all solutions, i.e., digests, blanks and standard solutions, were quantified in triplicate. Simultaneous quantification of the analytes was performed either by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) or by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). The choice of method applied was based on the expected concentration of analyte. The summary of the instrumental conditions alongside the analytes is given in Table 1.

4.5. Optimisation and Characterisation of the Analytical Method

The digest solutions of the pine needles SRM were measured five times for the replicate data as basis for precision expressed as relative standard deviation (RSD). The trueness of the methods, presented as recovery, was determined using the same solutions and calculated based on the following formula:

recoveryx in %= contentx, found in mg/kgcontentx, certified in mg/kg·100 (1)

Furthermore, the day-to-day repeatability was calculated based on analysis of selected samples (n = 3) on different days.

The limits of detection (LOD) and the limits of quantitation (LOQ) for all analytes in the given needle matrix were based on eleven blank measurements calculated using 3 σ and 10 σ, respectively.

4.6. Calculations and Statistics

All obtained elemental concentrations in the digest solutions were blank corrected prior to calculating the results as contents per dry weight considering dilution steps as well as mass of dried sample. In order to check the hypothesis that there is essentially no difference between the mean content in the needle samples from different sampling sites, ANOVA-tests—based on the 0.05 level of significance—were performed using the data-analysis add-in for Excel 2013. Since not all data obtained were normally distributed, a Kruskal–Wallis-test (non-parametric test) was carried out to prove the outcome of the ANOVA test, using the XLSTAT add-in for Excel.

5. Conclusions

The presented study is the first thorough investigation of elemental contents in Aleppo pine needles in Croatia including 21 metals and metalloids to follow environmental pollution. Correlation of the needle contents to soil data revealed that the metal uptake via roots represents only one way for metal to enter plants. An additional important factor is the foliar uptake due to dry and wet precipitation. Various elements from anthropological as well as environmental sources can pass long distances due to translocation processes. Regional differences were found for thirteen of the elements investigated, including on the one hand major elements and trace elements, and on the other hand rock-forming elements and pollutants caused by anthropological activity. Apart from the environmental objective of the study, the safe use of needles in various applications in the form of home remedies was evaluated. Less than 10% of the analysed trees contained Cd and/or Pb in their needles in amounts higher than allowed for medicinal plants according to WHO.

Acknowledgments

The authors express their thanks to all colleagues who helped with collecting the needle samples and during the measurements.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.Z. and I.J.C.; methodology, M.Z., A.K. and I.J.C.; validation, M.Z., A.K. and I.J.C.; investigation, M.Z., A.K. and I.J.C.; resources, M.Z. and I.J.C.; writing—original draft preparation, M.Z; writing—review and editing, M.Z.; project administration, M.Z. and I.J.C.; funding acquisition, M.Z. and I.J.C.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Sample Availability: Dried needle samples of different trees are available from the authors.

References

  • 1.Miller P. The Gardeners Dictionary. John and Francis Rivington; London, UK: 1768. pp. 886–108673. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Vidaković M. Conifers: Morphology and Variation. Grafički Zavod Hrvatske; Zagreb, Croatia: 1991. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Postu P.A., Sadiki F.Z., El Idrissi M., Cioanca O., Trifan A., Hancianu M., Hritcu L. Pinus halepensis essential oil attenuates the toxic Alzheimer’s amyloid beta (1-42)-induced memory impairment and oxidative stress in the rat hippocampus. Biomed. Pharm. 2019;112:108673. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.108673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Salhi N., Bouyahya A., Fettach S., Zellou A., Cherrah Y. Ethnopharmacological study of medicinal plants used in the treatment of skin burns in occidental Morocco (area of Rabat) S. Afr. J. Bot. 2019;121:128–142. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2018.10.038. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Salim H., Rimawi WH., Shaheen S., Mjahed A. Phytochemical analysis and antibacterial activity of extracts from Palestinian Aleppo pine seeds, bark and cones. Asian. J. Chem. 2019;31:143–147. doi: 10.14233/ajchem.2019.21633. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tekić I., Fuerst-Bjeliš B., Durbešić A. Rasprostranjenost alepskig bora (Pinus halepensis Mill.) in njegov utjecaj na vegetaciju i strukturu pejzaža šireg Šibenskog područja. Distribution of Aleppo pine (Pinus halepensis Mill.) and its effects on vegetation and landscape structure of wider area of Šibenik. Šumar. List. 2014;11–12:593–600. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Maestre F.T., Cortina J. Are Pinus halepensis plantations useful as a restoration tool in semiarid Mediterranean areas? Ecol. Manag. 2004;198:303–317. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.05.040. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zethof J.H.T., Cammeraat E.L.H., Nadal-Romero E. The enhancing effect of afforestation over secondary succession on soil quality under semiarid climate conditions. Sci. Total Environ. 2019;652:1090–1101. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Al-Alawi M.M., Mandiwana K.L. The use of Aleppo pine needles as a bio-monitor of heavy metals in the atmosphere. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007;148:43–46. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sardans J., Peñuelas J. Trace element accumulation in the moss Hypnum cupressiforme Hedw. and the trees Quercus ilex L. and Pinus halepensis Mill. in Catalonia. Chemosphere. 2005;60:1293–1307. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.01.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Austruy A., Yung L., Ambrosi J.P., Girardclos O., Keller C., Angeletti B., Dron J., Chamaret P., Chalot M. Evaluation of historical atmospheric pollution in an industrial area by dendrochemical approaches. Chemosphere. 2019;220:116–126. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.12.072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rodríguez Martin J.A., Gutiérrez C., Torrijos M., Nanos N. Wood and bark of Pinus halepensis as archives of heavy metal pollution in the Mediterranean Region. Environ. Pollut. 2018;239:438–447. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.04.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Al-Alawi M.M., Batarseh M.I., Carreras H., Alawi M., Jiries A., Charlesworth S.M. Aleppo pine bark as a biomonitor of atmospheric pollution in the arid environment of Jordan. Clean Soil Air Water. 2007;35:438–443. doi: 10.1002/clen.200720017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Čeburnis D., Steinnes E. Conifer needles as biomonitors of atmospheric heavy metal deposition: Comparison with mosses and precipitation, role of the canopy. Atmos. Environ. 2000;34:4265–4271. doi: 10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00213-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Herceg Romanić S., Krauthacker B. Are pine needles bioindicators of air pollution? Comparison of organochlorine compound levels in pine needles and ambient air. Arh. Hig. Rada. Toksikol. 2007;58:195–199. doi: 10.2478/v10004-007-0012-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bertolotti G., Gialanella S. Review: Use of conifer needles as passive samplers of inorganic pollutants in air quality monitoring. Anal. Methods. 2014;6:6208–6222. doi: 10.1039/C4AY00172A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lehndorff E., Schwark L. Accumulation histories of major and trace elements on pine needles in the cologne conurbation as function of air quality. Atmos. Environ. 2010;44:2822–2829. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosEnviron.2010.04.052. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Serbula S.M., Kalinovic T.S., Ilic A.A., Kalinovic J.V., Steharnik M.M. Assessment of Airborne Heavy Metal Pollution Using Pinus spp. and Tilia spp. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2013;13:563–573. doi: 10.4209/aaqr.2012.06.0153. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Varnagiryte-Kabasinskiene I., Armolaitis K., Stupak I., Kukkola M., Wójcik J., Mikšys V. Some metals in aboveground biomass of Scots pine in Lithuania. Biomass Bioenergy. 2014;66:434–441. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.03.047. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Juranović-Cindrić I., Zeiner M., Starčević A., Liber Z., Rusak G., Idžojtić M., Stingeder G. Influence of F1 hybridization on the metal uptake behaviour of pine trees (Pinus nigra x Pinus thunbergiana; Pinus thunbergiana x Pinus nigra) J. Trace. Elem. Med. Biol. 2018;48:190–195. doi: 10.1016/j.jtemb.2018.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Parzych A., Mochnacký S., Sobisz Z., Kurhaluk N., Polláková N. Accumulation of heavy metals in needles and bark of Pinus species. Folia. Pol. Ser. A. 2017;59:34–44. doi: 10.1515/ffp-2017-0004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Plank C.O., Kissel D.E. Plant Analysis Handbook for Georgia. [(accessed on 04 March 2019)]; Available online: http://aesl.ces.uga.edu/publications/plant.
  • 23.Wittig R. General aspects of biomonitoring heavy metals by plants. In: Markert B., editor. Plants as Biomonitors/Indicator for Heavy Metals in The Terrestrial Environment. VCH Publisher; Weinheim, Germany: 1993. pp. 3–28. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Juranović Cindrić I., Zeiner M., Starčević A., Stingeder G. Metals in pine needles: Characterisation of bio-indicators depending on species. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018 doi: 10.1007/s13762-018-2096-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zeiner M., Juranović Cindrić I., Konanov-Mihajlov D., Stingeder G. Differences in bioaccumulation of essential and toxic elements by white and red hawthorn. Curr. Anal. Chem. 2017;13:299–304. doi: 10.2174/1573411012666161017121755. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tarvainen T., Albanese S., Birke M., Poňavič M., Reimann C. Arsenic in agricultural and grazing land soils of Europe. Appl. Geochem. 2013;28:2–10. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2012.10.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Salminen R. (chief editor) Geochemical Atlas of Europe. Part 1—Background Information, Methodology, and Maps. Geological Survey of Finland; Espoo, Finland: 2005. [(accessed on 25 March 2019)]. Available online: http://weppi.gtk.fi/publ/foregsatlas/ [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Halamić J., Peh Z., Miko S., Galović L., Šorša A. Tehnologije zbrinjavanja otpada i zaštite tla. In: Vasić-Rački Đ., editor. Geokemijski Atlas Republike Hrvatske (Geochemical Atlas of the Republic of Croatia) Akademija tehničkih znanosti Hrvatske; Zadar, Croatia: 2009. pp. 161–170. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Birke M., Reimann C., Rauch U., Ladenberger A., Demetriades A., Jähne-Klingberg F., Oorts K., Gosar M., Dinelli E., Halamić J. GEMAS: Cadmium distribution and its sources in agricultural and grazing land soil of Europe—Original data versus clr-transformed data. J. Geochem. Explor. 2017;173:13–30. doi: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2016.11.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tausz M., Trummer W., Gössler W., Wonisch A., Grill D., Naumann S., Jiménex M.S., Morales D. Accumulating pollutants in conifer needles on an Atlantic island e A case study with Pinus canariensis on Tenerife, Canary Islands. Environ. Pollut. 2005;136:397–407. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2005.01.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Robinson B.H., Yalamanchali R., Reiser R., Dickinson N.M. Lithium as an emerging environmental contaminant: Mobility in the soil-plant system. Chemosphere. 2018;197:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Power P.P., Woods W.O. The chemistry of boron and its speciation in plants. Plant Soil. 1997;193:1–13. doi: 10.1023/A:1004231922434. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Antunović Z., Steiner Zd., Vegara M., Šperanda M., Steiner Z., Novoselec J. Concentration of selenium in soil, pasture, blood and wool of sheep. Acta Vet. 2010;60:263–271. doi: 10.2298/AVB1003263A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Cicchella D., Zuzolo D., Demetriades A., De Vivo B., Eklund M., Ladenberger A., Negrel P., O’Connor P. GEMAS: Molybdenum Spatial Distribution Patterns in European Soil. Geophys. Resear. Abs. 2017;19:2017–9179. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.WHO WHO: Geneva Switzerland; 1998. Quality Control Methods for Medicinal Plant Materials. [(accessed on 26 March 2019)]; Available online: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/1998/9241545100.pdf.

Articles from Molecules are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES