Skip to main content
. 2019 May 27;16(10):1864. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16101864

Table 3.

Summary of the primary outcome. RTW: return to work; CBT: cognitive-behavioral therapy; PEMF: Pulsed Electro Magnetic Fields.

Outcome/Diseases Intervention Study
n
Participants
n
Statistical method Effect size
1. RTW (lasting RTW, RTW rate, RTW percentage, employment rate, work resumed) 5
 1.1. Adjustment disorder Work focused CBT 1 163 Hazard Ratio (95% CI) 1.7 (1.01 to 2.44)
 1.2. Work-related chronic stress PEMF 1 84 Mean difference p-value 0.92
 1.3. Stroke Work place intervention 1 80 Odds ratio (95% CI) 5.2 (1.8 to 15.0)
 1.4. Long-term mental illness Supported employment program 1 92 Odds ratio (95% CI) 5.63 (2.28 to 13.84)
 1.5. Isthmic spondylolisthesis Three different rehabilitation programs 1 90 Mean difference p-value 0.04
2. Work ability 4
 2.1. Chronic low back pain 2.1.1. Functional restoration program 2 99 Mean difference p-value 0.64
2.1.2 Vocational rehabilitation 56 Mean difference p-value 0.005
 2.2. Chronic rheumatic disease Job-retention vocational rehabilitation program 1 140 Mean difference p-value 0.13
 2.3. Different diseases Phone-based coaching 1 59 Pre-mean (SD) 3.39 (0.75)
Post-mean (SD) 3.82 (0.39)
3. Sick leave until full RTW, long-term sick leave, sickness absence 4
 3.1. Stress related mental disease 1 433 Hazard Ratio (95% CI) 1.06 (0.87 to 1.29)
 3.2. Chronic low back pain 3.2.1. Different intervention (behavioral oriented physiotherapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, behavioral medicine rehabilitation) using a psychosocial subgroup 2
194 mean difference, (95% CI) BM: −16.08,
(−38.0 to 5.8)
PT: −0.55,
(−22.5 to 21.4),
CBT: −7.79, (−26.9 to 11.3)
3.2.2. Workplace and patient-oriented interventions 134 Hazard Ratio (95% CI) 1.9 (1.2 to2.8)
 3.3. Spinal pain Cognitive behavioral intervention and two forms of information 1 243 Mean difference p-value <0.05, RR = 9.3