Skip to main content
. 2019 May 23;8(5):737. doi: 10.3390/jcm8050737

Table 2.

Extracted data of included randomized controlled trials.

Trial Name/ID Number Experimental Arm Control Arm Patient Numbers Median Follow-Up Overall Response Rate Median PFS Hazard Ratio (95% CI), PFS Median OS Hazard Ratio (95% CI), OS
Study 119 Idelalisib Ofatumumab Ofatumumab 174 vs. 87 16.1 vs. 5.8 months 75.3% vs. 18.4% 16.4 vs. 8.0 months 0.26 (0.18 to 0.38) NR vs NR 0.750 (0.48 to 1.18)
DUO trial Duvelisib Ofatumumab 160 vs. 159 22.4 months 73.8% vs. 45.3% 13.3 vs. 9.9 months 0.52 (0.39 to 0.7) NR vs NR 0.99 (0.65 to 1.5)
RESONATE Ibrutinib Ofatumumab 195 vs. 196 19 months 90% vs. 25% NR vs. 8.1 months 0.10 (0.07 to 0.15) NR vs NR 0.361 (0.208 to 0.628)
CR102604 Ibrutinib Rituximab 106 vs. 54 17.8 months 67.9% vs. 7.4% NR vs. 8.3 months 0.18 (0.105 to 0.308) NR vs 26.1 months 0.446 (0.221 to 0.9)
HELIOS Ibrutinib BR BR 289 vs. 289 17 months 86% vs. 69% NR vs. 13.3 months 0.203 (0.15 to 0.276) NR vs NR 0.628 (0.385 to 1.024)
MURANO Venetoclax R BR 194 vs. 195 23.8 months 93.3% vs. 67.7% NR vs. 17 months 0.17 (0.12 to 0.26) NR vs NR 0.48 (0.25 to 0.9)
TUGELA Idelalisib BR BR 207 vs. 209 14 months 70% vs. 45% 20.8 vs. 11.1 months 0.33 (0.25 to 0.44) NR vs 31.6 months 0.62 (0.42 to 0.92)

PFS: Progression-free survival, OS: Overall survival, B: Bendamustine, R: Rituximab, NR: Not reached, CI: Confidence interval.