Skip to main content
. 2019 May 16;16(10):1736. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16101736

Table 2.

Prevalence of equine piroplasmosis in donkeys/mules in endemic continents and countries using different diagnostic methods (2008–2018).

Diagnostic Technique Year Continent Country Equine Spec (Donkey/Mules) Sample Size Prevalence (%)
(B. caballi & T. equi)
Reference
Microscopy 2013 Africa Ethiopia Donkeys 393 1.8 and 12.2 [105]
cELISA 2015 Africa Kenya Donkeys 314 0 and 81.2 [106]
2016 Africa Egypt Donkeys 51 0 and 18.0 [48]
ELISA 2014 Asia Thailand Mules 177 3.4 and 7.3 [92]
2016 Asia India Donkeys 20 0 and 80.0 [81]
2013 Europe Spain Mules 56 32.1 and 66.1 [65]
2013 Europe Spain Donkeys 53 17.0 and 47.2 [65]
2012 South America Brazil Donkeys 88 NA and 73.9 [107]
IFAT 2013 Africa Ethiopia Donkeys 395 13.2 and 55.7 [105]
2016 Africa Egypt Donkeys 51 22.3 and 26.6 [48]
2014 Asia Thailand Mules 177 2.8 and 10.7 [92]
2015 Europe Italy Donkey 138 40.6 and 47.8 [44]
2012 South America Brazil Donkeys 88 93.2 and NA [107]
PCR 2016 Africa Egypt Donkeys 51 18 and 38.8 [48]
2014 Asia Thailand Mules 177 0 and 1.7 [92]
2016 Asia India Donkeys/mules 20 NA and 35.0 [81]
2012 South America Brazil Donkeys 88 20.5 and 31.8 [107]
2015 Europe Italy Donkeys 134 17.4 and 3.4 [44]

Abbreviations: NA—not available in the text, CFT—Compliment Fixation Test, IFAT—Indirect Florescent Antibody Test, cELISA—Competitive Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay, ELISA—Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay, PCR—Polymerase Chain Reaction.