Table 3.
Performance of Vitek 2 compact system, Vitek MS, and Bruker Biotyper MS compared with 26S rDNA gene sequencing for the identification of 62 Kodamaea ohmeri isolates
| Identification system | Correct identification to species level | Correct identification to genus level | No identification (invalid result) | Misidentification | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | |
| Vitek 2 Compact | 51 | 82.3 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 17.7 | 0 | 0 |
| Vitek MS system | 61 | 98.4 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 1.6 | 0 | 0 |
| Bruker Biotyper MS system | ||||||||
| Direct transfer | 8 | 12.9 | 44 | 71.0 | 10 | 16.1 | 0 | 0 |
| Protein extraction | 60 | 96.8 | 2 | 3.2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |