Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 14;43(5):374–387. doi: 10.1177/0146621618798666

Table 1.

Model Fit Comparisons for Identification Indices When Minimizing False Positives.

Adm. CFI RMSEA [90% CI] SRMR n
1
 Raw 0.742 .065 [.063, .068] 0.064 1,236
 Inst. Res. 0.770 .062 [.059, .064] 0.057 1,111
 H T 0.748 .063 [.061, .065] 0.061 1,217
 zGutt 0.754 .061 [.059, .063] 0.058 1,218
 lz 0.772 .060 [.059, .063] 0.057 1,218
 U3 0.755 .061 [.059, .063] 0.058 1,218
 Resp. time 0.751 .062 [.062, .066] 0.062 1,214
2
 Raw 0.730 .066 [.065, .067] 0.063 3,505
 Inst. Res. 0.749 .064 [.062, .065] 0.058 3,176
 H T 0.736 .064 [.063, .065] 0.060 3,465
 zGutt 0.739 .064 [.062, .065] 0.059 3,461
 lz 0.752 .063 [.062, .064] 0.058 3,460
 U3 0.738 .064 [.062, .065] 0.059 3,460
 Resp. time 0.739 .065 [.064, .066] 0.061 3,447

Note. Adm. = administration; CFI = comparative fit index; RMSEA = root mean square error approximation; CI = confidence interval; SRMR = standardized root mean squared residual; Inst. Res. = instructed response; zGutt = normed Guttman errors; Resp. Time = response time.