Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 14;43(5):374–387. doi: 10.1177/0146621618798666

Table 2.

Model Fit Comparisons for Identification Indices When Minimizing False Negatives.

Adm. CFI RMSEA [90% CI] SRMR n
1
 Raw 0.742 .065 [.063, .068] 0.064 1,236
 Inst. Res. 0.770 .062 [.059, .064] 0.057 1,111
 H T 0.769 .050 [.045, .054] 0.057 431
 zGutt 0.654 .055 [.049, .061] 0.073 242
 lz 0.825 .053 [.049, .058] 0.059 371
 U3 0.637 .057 [.050, .063] 0.074 228
 Resp. time 0.762 .065 [.060, .070] 0.067 325
2
 Raw 0.730 .066 [.065, .067] 0.063 3,505
 Inst. Res. 0.749 .064 [.062, .065] 0.058 3,176
 H T 0.759 .050 [.047, .053] 0.052 777
 zGutt 0.710 .050 [.047, .043] 0.056 757
 lz 0.866 .047 [.045, .049] 0.044 1,155
 U3 0.698 .049 [.046, .053] 0.057 734
 Resp. time 0.713 .067 [.064, .071] 0.061 619

Note. Adm. = administration; CFI = comparative fit index; RMSEA = root mean square error approximation; CI = confidence interval; SRMR = standardized root mean squared residual; Inst. Res. = instructed response; zGutt = normed Guttman errors; Resp. Time = response time.