Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 14;43(5):374–387. doi: 10.1177/0146621618798666

Table 3.

Model Fit Comparisons for Identification Indices When Maximizing AUC.

Adm. CFI RMSEA [90% CI] SRMR n
1
 Raw 0.742 .065 [.063, .068] 0.064 1,236
 Inst. Res. 0.770 .062 [.059, .064] 0.057 1,111
 H T 0.702 .062 [.059, .065] 0.063 1,217
 zGutt 0.642 .057 [.052, .062] 0.071 1,218
 lz 0.800 .057 [.053, .061] 0.061 1,218
 U3 0.618 .059 [.055, .062] 0.071 1,218
 Resp. time 0.768 .062 [.059, .064] 0.058 1,214
2
 Raw 0.730 .066 [.065, .067] 0.063 3,505
 Inst. Res. 0.749 .064 [.062, .065] 0.058 3,176
 H T 0.702 .062 [.060, .063] 0.060 2,836
 zGutt 0.743 .046 [.042, .049] 0.055 563
 lz 0.830 .053 [.051, .055] 0.048 1,670
 U3 0.687 .058 [.057, .060] 0.059 2,325
 Resp. time 0.752 .063 [.062, .064] 0.058 3,030

Note. AUC = area under the curve; Adm. = administration; CFI = comparative fit index; RMSEA = root mean square error approximation; CI = confidence interval; SRMR = standardized root mean squared residual; Inst. Res. = instructed response; zGutt = normed Guttman errors; Resp. Time = response time.