. 1997 Jul 1;17(13):5004–5015. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-13-05004.1997

Table 2.

Correlations between reflex force and EMG activity before and after ipsilateral DLF lesions.

Reflex parameter	Force (gm)	Soleus EMG		MG EMG		Total EMG
Reflex parameter	Force (gm)	μV	r	μV	r	μV	r
Prelesion control
Background force	54 ± 7	18 ± 2	0.43^*	13 ± 2	0.56^*	32 ± 3	0.54^*
Dynamic amplitude	466 ± 33	60 ± 5	0.61^*	64 ± 10	0.81^*	130 ± 13	0.88^*
Static amplitude	376 ± 29	47 ± 5	0.44^*	43 ± 7	0.81^*	98 ± 9	0.83^*
T13–L3 DLF lesion
Background force	134 ± 19	26 ± 6	0.37^*	24 ± 6	0.58	50 ± 11	0.54
Dynamic amplitude	808 ± 50	82 ± 7	0.56^*	78 ± 17	0.94^*	175 ± 23	0.92^*
Static amplitude	665 ± 44	64 ± 8	0.44^*	59 ± 13	0.96^*	128 ± 18	0.94^*

EMG activity is shown for MG, SOL, and their sum (total), averaged over 6 week prelesion and postlesion periods.

Statistical significance at p < 0.05; n = 4.