Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 14;7:e7121. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7121

Table 2. Rates of detectable chimeras in sequence data.

Average rates of detectable chimeras are shown for each experiment performed in this study. Significantly lower rates of chimera formation were observed for DePCR-amplified gDNA samples relative to TAS-amplified samples, across multiple annealing temperatures. No significant difference in chimera formation was observed with DePCR methodology with varying gDNA input levels. Significantly higher chimera formation was also observed with TAS relative to DePCR when individual primer variants (RPVs) were utilized.

Experiment PCR Method Annealing Temp. (°C) Input concentration (ng/reaction) Chimera detection rate [Average (SD)] ANOVA
Annealing temperature TAS 40 10 5.16% (0.37%) 1.41E-09
DePCR 40 10 0.05% (0.03%)
TAS 45 10 6.49% (0.29%) 4.05E-11
DePCR 45 10 0.10% (0.07%)
TAS 50 10 6.53% (0.21%) 2.02E-12
DePCR 50 10 0.04% (0.02%)
TAS 55 10 5.69% (0.39%) 9.66E-10
DePCR 55 10 0.05% (0.02%)
TAS 60 10 5.46% (0.49%) 7.56E-09
DePCR 60 10 0.03% (0.02%)
Input gDNA concentration DePCR 50 20 0.05% (0.02%) 5.20E-01
DePCR 50 10 0.03% (0.03%)
DePCR 50 5 0.03% (0.01%)
DePCR 50 2.5 0.02% (0.01%)
DePCR 50 1.25 0.03% (0.03%)
Reverse primer variants TAS 50 10 11.98% (3.85%) 0.00
DePCR 50 10 0.06% (0.08%)

Notes.

SD
standard deviation