Skip to main content
. 1996 May 15;16(10):3236–3246. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-10-03236.1996

Table 1.

Axon volume and microtubule mass

Treatment Axon diameter (μm) (±SEM) Axon length (μm) (±SEM), # cells Axon volume1_a(μm3) Corrected axon volume1_b(μm3) Microtubules per cross-section (±SEM), # cross-section profiles Microtubules mass1_c Microtubule profile density1_d
Control (24 hr) 0.51 ± 0.07  n = 14 1024 ± 208 n =  8 209 459 22 ± 1.6 n = 41 22,528 110
Control (9 hr) 0.58 ± 0.06  n = 16  4801_e 127 278 27 ± 4.4 n = 16 12,960 104
165 nmnocodazole 1.01 ± 0.16  n = 14  568 ± 124 n = 14 454 504 43 ± 3.9 n = 25 24,424  53
330 nm nocodazole 2.00 ± 0.16  n = 21  270 ± 49  n = 14 848 511 66 ± 5.9 n = 21 17,820  21
F1_a

Axon volume was calculated fromv = πr2 × l, wherer = radius and l = axon length (total outgrowth from dissociated cells).

F1_b

Two adjustments for volume were made to correct for deviations from a perfect cylinder: (1) the frequency, length, and diameter of periodic varicosities were measured and then incorporated into the calculations (see Materials and Methods); (2) increasing nocodazole concentrations resulted in axons that appeared as flattened cylinders. Calculations were also adjusted for the flattening effect by assuming that the axon cross-section in the nocodazole-treated cultures was represented by an oval.

F1_c

Microtubule mass was calculated by multiplying axon length (total outgrowth from dissociated neurons) by the average number of microtubules per axon cross-section.

F1_d

Microtubule profile density refers to the density of cross-sectioned microtubules profiles per axonal cross-sectional area (μm2).

F1_e

In this case, explant outgrowth from one explant was used instead of measuring the length of neurites from individual neurons.