Table 10.
Mean rCBF changes for visual extrastriate areas previously determined to be involved in picture processing
| Location | PICTURE RECALL minus AUD. WORD RECALL | PICTURE RECALL minus REPETITION | PICTURE RECALL minus REST | AUD. WORD RECALL minus REPETITION | AUD. WORD RECALL minus REST | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| x | y | z | Mean | SE | Mean | SE | Mean | SE | Mean | SE | Mean | SE | 
| −21 | −91 | 18 | −4 | 10 | −16 | 11 | −77 | 15 | −1 | 11 | −73 | 15 | 
| −31 | −73 | 0 | −4 | 12 | −6 | 13 | −39 | 11 | −3 | 15 | −40 | 12 | 
| 13 | −95 | 20 | −10 | 13 | 0 | 12 | −53 | 14 | 3 | 15 | −59 | 8 | 
| 33 | −57 | −2 | −1 | 15 | −25 | 13 | −35 | 18 | −37 | 17 | −41 | 11 | 
| 41 | −79 | 4 | −11 | 12 | −25 | 9 | −68 | 14 | −14 | 13 | −58 | 14 | 
Stereotaxic locations for the five regions found to be activated during picture viewing (Buckner et al., 1995c). Mean regional activation values for these five regions are listed along with the SEM for five different task comparisons in the present study. No areas showed significant mean rCBF increases. Values in bold indicate mean rCBF was significantly decreased below zero (p < 0.05).