(
a) The experimental timeline where young cells are trapped in the microfluidic device and bright-field images are taken every 20 min to define the cell’s age and fluorescent images are taken once every 15 hr to detect the protein localization and abundance. (
b) The median number of completed divisions during the first 15 hr in the microfluidic chip of different strains used in this study and grown on glucose. Please see
Figure 4—figure supplement 3 for three strains grown on galactose. ^ Pho4NLS and Nab2NLS are reporter strains, where the NLS is fused to a GFP under the control of the conditional TPI1 promotor. The tagging of Nups with GFP reduces the fitness of the cells to various extends. (
c) Heat map representation of the changes in the levels of the indicated GFP- and mCh-tagged Nups at the NE in each yeast cell at increasing age. Each line represents a single cell’s life history showing the change in the ratio of the fluorescence from the GFP-tagged Nup over the fluorescence from the mCh-tagged Nup and normalized to their ratio at time zero. Measurement of the fluorescence ratios are marked with ‘x’; in between two measurements, the data was linearly interpolated. The fold changes are color coded on a log 2 scale from −1 to + 1, except for Nup2 where the changes were larger and the scale runs from −2 to 2; blue colors indicate decreasing levels of the GFP-fusion relative to mCh. Number of cells in the heatmaps are Nup133-GFP/Nup49-mCh = 94, Nup49-GFP/Nup133-mCh = 108, Nup2-GFP/Nup49-mCh = 98. Data from Nup133-GFP/Nup49-mCh is repeated from
Figure 1b middle panel for easy comparison with the tag-swapped strain Nup49-GFP/Nup133-mCh and illustration of the systematic changes in the fluorescence from GFP and mCh in aging; see also panel e. (
d) Normalized GFP/Nup49-mCh ratio representing the average from cells shown in panel b and
Figure 1e. The indicated age is the average number of divisions at time points 0 hr, 15 hr, 30 hr. Error bars are SD of the mean. For Nup116-GFP the change in abundance becomes significant after 15 hr, with p<0.001. For Nup2-GFP and Nup100-GFP the change in abundance is significant with p<0.005 after 30 hr. The number of all measurements contributing to the means (N) at the time points 0 hr, 15 hr and 30 hr were for Nup116 = 76, 70 and 32; for Nup100 = 139, 137 and 86; for Nup2 = 112, 116 and 58; and for Nup133 = 102, 109 and 45, respectively. (
e) The average fluorescence intensities from GFP and mCh in Nup133-GFP/Nup49-mCh and the tag-swapped strain Nup49-GFP/Nup133-mCh increase in time during replicative aging experiments, but more so for mCh than for GFP. The systematic changes in the fluorescence from GFP and mCh in aging is likely caused by differences in the maturation times of both fluorophores and/or their pH sensitivity. For the strain expressing Nup49-GFP and Nup133-mCh, N = 113, 104 and 50, and for the strains expressing Nup133-GFP and Nup49-mCh, N = 102, 85 and 27 at time points 0 hr, 15 hr and 30 hr, respectively. Error bars are SD of the mean. (
f) The abundance of Nup116-GFP (gray) and Nup100 (black) at the NE relative to Nup49-mCh as a function of remaining lifespan. The dotted lines indicate the best linear fit. Total number of cells analysed are Nup116 = 15 and Nup100 = 35 and the total number of measurements are Nup116 = 34 and Nup100 = 108. (
g) Additional independent replicate (coming from a different microscope) for Nup100-GFP/Nup49-mCh abundance correlation to lifespan. The cells in f and g were imaged with different filter settings explaining the different ratios. Number of cells analysed are N = 62 and number of measurements are N = 101.