Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pathol. 2019 Apr 22;248(3):260–265. doi: 10.1002/path.5261

Table 1.

shows clinicopathologic details on 11 IUP and 11 UP cases included in the study.

Case Histology Sex Age (Years) Matched Normal Estimated Tumor Purity (%) Target Mean Coverage IMPACT Assay VAF of Driver Alterations (%)
IUP 1 Inverted Papilloma Male 69 No 60 481 19
IUP 2 Inverted Papilloma Male 77 No 75 501 45
IUP 3 Inverted Papilloma Female 66 No 80 613 45
IUP 4 Inverted Papilloma Male 57 No 80 677 46
IUP 5 Inverted Papilloma Female 60 No 85 539 47
*IUP 6 Inverted Papilloma Male 61 Yes 80 575 41
IUP 7 Inverted Papilloma Male 66 No 80 594 43
IUP 8 Inverted Papilloma Male 90 Yes 75 572 41
*IUP 9 Inverted Papilloma Male 53 Yes 80 579 41
*IUP 10 Inverted Papilloma Male 65 Yes 70 459 36
IUP 11 Inverted Papilloma Male 86 No 80 690 56

UP 1 Papilloma Male 70 No 85 600 51
UP 2 Papilloma Male 54 No 80 711 59
UP 3 Papilloma Female 81 No 80 405 59
*UP 4 Papilloma Female 51 Yes 50 570 16
UP 5 Papilloma Male 69 Yes 70 667 54
UP 6 Papilloma Male 65 Yes 20 409 3
*UP 7 Papilloma Male 71 Yes 60 579 31
UP 8 Papilloma Female 31 No 70 597 39
UP 9 Papilloma Female 62 Yes 70 671 25
*UP 10 Papilloma Male 51 Yes 50 875 22
UP 11 Papilloma Male 66 Yes 60 518 33
*

Cases that underwent WES also