Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 11;7(2):E391–E398. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20190053

Table 3:

Mixed-effects model results for patients aged 75 years or more before and after implementation of the Quebec Alzheimer Plan*

Variable No. (%) of patients OR (95% Cl) ICC
Before
n = 944
After
n = 975
Documentation of cognitive status 351 (37.2) 440 (45.1) 1.46 (1.18–1.81) 0.03
Documented diagnosis of neurocognitive disorder 208 (22.0) 255 (26.2) 1.25 (0.98–1.60) 0.02
 Dementia 127 (13.4) 141 (14.5)
 Mild cognitive impairment 41 (4.3) 52 (5.3)
 Unspecified 40 (4.2) 62 (6.4) -
No documented diagnosis of neurocognitive disorder 736 (78.0) 720 (73.8)
Cognitive testing 137 (14.6)
n = 940
166 (17.1)
n = 972
1.21 (0.92–1.60) 0.03
Referral to memory clinic 22 (2.5)
n = 886
19 (2.1)
n = 901
0.84 (0.42–1.68) 0.04
Justified referral§** 14 (63.6) 16 (84.2)
 Uncertainty 6 (42.9) 7 (43.8)
 Family request 1 (7.1) 5 (31.2)
 Presence of depression 1 (7.1) 2 (12.5)
 Complex medication management 3 (21.4) 0 (0.0)
 Complex patient management 6 (42.9) 6 (37.5)
Other reason†† 2 (9.1) 0 (0.0)
Unjustified referral 6 (27.3) 3 (15.8)
 No prior evaluation 3 (50.0) 2 (66.7)
 Blank referral 3 (50.0) 1 (33.3)

Note: CI = confidence interval, ICC = intraclass correlation coefficient, OR = odds ratio.

*

Model estimates adjusted for age, sex and number of medications.

Excluding patients who refused the evaluation.

Excluding patients referred before the study period.

§

Defined in accordance with Canadian guidelines.14,15

Proportions of subgroups.

**

There could be more than 1 reason for referral.

††

Documented reasons not mentioned in Canadian guidelines.