Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 17;9(7):52. doi: 10.1038/s41408-019-0213-9

Table 1.

Clinical characteristics of FL patients (n = 187)

Variable Training cohort n (%)
Age, years (median, range) 58 (19–87)
Sex F/M 99 (53/8847)
Histological gradea
I 84 (48.8)
II 67 (39)
IIIA 21 (12.2)
FLIPIa
0–1 (Low risk) 49 (32.9)
2 (Intermediate risk) 46 (30.9)
3–5 (High risk) 54 (36.2)
Ann Arbora
I 24 (14.2)
II 18 (10.7)
III 18 (10.7)
IV 109 (64.5)
First-line therapy
Never treated 24 (12.8)
Rituximab-based ICT 98 (52.4)
R-CHOP 68 (69.4)
R-Bendamustine 11 (11.2)
R-CVP 3 (3.1)
Others 16 (16.3)
CT without rituximab 48 (25.7)
CHOP 35 (72.9)
Fludarabine-based 3 (6.3)
Others 10 (20.8)
Radiotherapy alone or with rituximab 13 (7)
Rituximab alone 4 (2.1)
Maintenance with rituximaba 73 (39)
Response after induction therapy
CR 87 (53.7)
PR 63 (38.9)
NR/Failure 12 (7.4)

ICT immunochemotherapy, R rituximab, CHOP cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone, CVP cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone, CT chemotherapy; CR complete response, PR partial response, NR no response, FLIPI FL International Prognosis Index

aHistological grade was available for 172 (92%) patients; FLIPI was available for 149 (80%) patients; Ann Arbor was available for 169 (90%) patients; Maintenance was calculated for 147 (79%) patients