Table 1.
Variable | Training cohort n (%) |
---|---|
Age, years (median, range) | 58 (19–87) |
Sex F/M | 99 (53/8847) |
Histological gradea | |
I | 84 (48.8) |
II | 67 (39) |
IIIA | 21 (12.2) |
FLIPIa | |
0–1 (Low risk) | 49 (32.9) |
2 (Intermediate risk) | 46 (30.9) |
3–5 (High risk) | 54 (36.2) |
Ann Arbora | |
I | 24 (14.2) |
II | 18 (10.7) |
III | 18 (10.7) |
IV | 109 (64.5) |
First-line therapy | |
Never treated | 24 (12.8) |
Rituximab-based ICT | 98 (52.4) |
R-CHOP | 68 (69.4) |
R-Bendamustine | 11 (11.2) |
R-CVP | 3 (3.1) |
Others | 16 (16.3) |
CT without rituximab | 48 (25.7) |
CHOP | 35 (72.9) |
Fludarabine-based | 3 (6.3) |
Others | 10 (20.8) |
Radiotherapy alone or with rituximab | 13 (7) |
Rituximab alone | 4 (2.1) |
Maintenance with rituximaba | 73 (39) |
Response after induction therapy | |
CR | 87 (53.7) |
PR | 63 (38.9) |
NR/Failure | 12 (7.4) |
ICT immunochemotherapy, R rituximab, CHOP cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone, CVP cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone, CT chemotherapy; CR complete response, PR partial response, NR no response, FLIPI FL International Prognosis Index
aHistological grade was available for 172 (92%) patients; FLIPI was available for 149 (80%) patients; Ann Arbor was available for 169 (90%) patients; Maintenance was calculated for 147 (79%) patients