Table 2.
Results of the fractional factorial design matrix of rice straw degradation.
| Running number | X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | Reducing sugar yield (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | −1 | 1.71 |
| 2 | 1 | −1 | 0 | 0 | 1.28 |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.43 |
| 4 | −1 | −1 | 0 | 0 | 1.23 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.7 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 | −1 | 1 | 1.78 |
| 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | −1 | 1.66 |
| 8 | 1 | 0 | −1 | 0 | 1.53 |
| 9 | 0 | −1 | −1 | 0 | 1.62 |
| 10 | 0 | −1 | 1 | 0 | 1.33 |
| 11 | −1 | 0 | −1 | 0 | 0.83 |
| 12 | −1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1.08 |
| 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.74 |
| 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.69 |
| 15 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1.79 |
| 16 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1.81 |
| 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.71 |
| 18 | 0 | −1 | 0 | −1 | 1.09 |
| 19 | −1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1.13 |
| 20 | −1 | 0 | 0 | −1 | 0.89 |
| 21 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1.75 |
| 22 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1.96 |
| 23 | 0 | −1 | 0 | 1 | 1.36 |
| 24 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1.66 |
| 25 | 0 | 1 | −1 | 0 | 1.78 |
| 26 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1.76 |
| 27 | 1 | 0 | 0 | −1 | 1.47 |
| 28 | 0 | 0 | −1 | −1 | 1.58 |
| 29 | −1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.94 |