Table 4.
Frequency and distribution of coded statements from participants about the information received from the AC.
No. of coded statements | Kruskall- | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
(% of participants) |
Wallis |
|||
Dyslexia- | Autism- | |||
Control | disclosure | disclosure | ||
(n = 80) | (n = 83) | (n = 92) | H | |
Information redundant | 37 (46%) | 33 (40%) | 28 (30%) | 3.456 |
Information explained misunderstanding | 4 (5%) | 8 (10%) | 12 (13%) | 3.137 |
Information led to greater tolerance | 14 (18%) | 23 (28%) | 44 (48%) | 12.169∗ |
Ambiguous statements | 26 (33%) | 22 (27%) | 15 (16%) | 1.642 |
∗p-value < 0.05. Post hoc pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni correction showed a significant difference only between participants in the autism condition and the control condition (p = 0.002).