Skip to main content
. 2019 May 28;18(1):678–684. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.7622

Table III.

Test results of PWT (g).

Variables Sham operation group Model group Group A Group B F value P-value
Before modeling 46.66±2.57 46.45±2.10 46.41±2.62 46.81±2.16   0.124 0.946
After modeling/before intervention 45.66±2.39   66.17±2.48a,d   65.67±3.03a,d   65.66±1.47a,d 350.961 <0.001
Three days after intervention 45.76±2.05   72.69±2.13a,d,e   52.91±1.69a,b,d,e   58.34±1.83ae 696.475 <0.001
a

P<0.05, compared with the sham operation group at the same time-point

b

P<0.05, compared with the model group at the same time-point

c

P<0.05, compared with group A at the same time-point

d

P<0.05, compared with before modeling in the same group

e

P<0.05, compared with after modeling/before intervention in the same group. PWT, paw withdrawal mechanical threshold.