Table 5.
Yield Force, N | Ultimate Force, N | Displacement to yield, µm | Postyield Displacement, µm | Total Displacement, µm | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group | |||||
WT VEH | 10.08 ± 0.99 | 13.52 ± 1.16 | 162.51 ± 12.49 | 843.05 ± 320.03 | 1,005.56 ± 312.72 |
Nmp4−/− VEH | 11.65 ± 2.44 | 14.27 ± 0.92 | 172.64 ± 26.99 | 619.27 ± 224.97 | 792.43 ± 217.81 |
WT RAL | 11.19 ± 0.20 | 14.67 ± 0.41 | 168.22 ± 12.96 | 689.72 ± 208.95 | 861.14 ± 199.79 |
Nmp4−/− RAL | 15.22 ± 1.20 | 15.22 ± 1.20 | 173.53 ± 15.73 | 594.32 ± 202.51 | 769.68 ± 193.22 |
WT PTH | 11.04 ± 2.06 | 16.94 ± 1.67 | 163.51 ± 28.73 | 711.57 ± 297.33 | 875.08 ± 288.88 |
Nmp4−/− PTH | 11.24 ± 1.79 | 17.06 ± 1.38 | 146.49 ± 18.81 | 742 ± 255.98 | 894.10 ± 252.89 |
WT PTH + RAL | 11.50 ± 1.18 | 18.38 ± 2.31 | 152.56 ± 34.07 | 540.96 ± 205.28 | 693.53 ± 202.12 |
Nmp4−/− PTH + RAL | 13.66 ± 2.51 | 19.43 ± 2.18 | 152.09 ± 8.08 | 458.30 ± 166.36 | 578.77 ± 109.62 |
Two-way ANOVA genotype | G: P = 0.0037 | G: P = 0.0680 | G: P = 0.9119 | G: P = 0.0610 | G: P = 0.0379 |
Nmp4−/−: 12.22a | WT: 858.83a | ||||
WT: 10.95b | Nmp4-/−: 758.74b | ||||
Two-way ANOVA treatment | T: P = 0.0243 | T: P < 0.0001 | T: P = 0.0137 | T: P = 0.0028 | T: P = 0.0005 |
P + R: 12.58a | P + R: 18.91a | R: 170.87a | V: 731.16a | V: 898.99a | |
R: 11.76a,b | P: 17.00b | V: 167.57a,b | P: 726.78a | P: 884.59a | |
P: 11.14a,b | R: 14.95c | P: 155.00a,b | R: 642.02a,b | R: 815.4a | |
V: 10.87b | V: 13.90c | P + R: 152.33b | P + R: 499.64b | P + R: 636.15b | |
Two-way ANOVA G × T | G × T: P = 0.4051 | G × T: P = 0.7791 | G × T: P = 0.1830 | G × T: P = 0.3475 | G × T: P = 0.3910 |
Stiffness, N/mm | Work to Yield, mJ | Post Yield Work, mJ | Total Work, mJ | ||
Group | |||||
WT VEH | 95.73 ± 6.19 | 0.92 ± 0.16 | 8.01 ± 2.16 | 8.93 ± 2.05 | |
Nmp4−/− VEH | 104.39 ± 10.17 | 1.05 ± 0.31 | 7.53 ± 2.63 | 8.64 ± 2.63 | |
WT RAL | 106.07 ± 12.65 | 1.05 ± 0.08 | 8.10 ± 1.91 | 9.15 ± 1.90 | |
Nmp4−/− RAL | 105.42 ± 16.10 | 1.19 ± 0.34 | 7.63 ± 2.14 | 8.91 ± 2.17 | |
WT PTH | 120.02 ± 22.68 | 0.94 ± 0.32 | 9.44 ± 2.92 | 10.38 ± 2.76 | |
Nmp4−/− PTH | 121.91 ± 16.51 | 0.89 ± 0.23 | 10.24 ± 2.81 | 11.18 ± 2.74 | |
WT PTH + RAL | 130.49 ± 10.66 | 0.92 ± 0.29 | 7.98 ± 1.97 | 8.97 ± 1.85 | |
Nmp4−/− PTH + RAL | 132.83 ± 17.91 | 1.25 ± 0.45 | 7.69 ± 2.61 | 8.94 ± 2.45 | |
Two-way ANOVA genotype | G: P = 0.3316 | G: P = 0.0315 | G: P = 0.8291 | G: P = 0.8989 | |
Nmp4-/−: 1.10a | |||||
WT: 0.96b | |||||
Two-way ANOVA treatment | T: P < 0.0001 | T: P = 0.0985 | T: P = 0.0103 | T: P = 0.0159 | |
P + R: 131.66a | P: 9.84a | P: 10.78a | |||
P: 120.97a | R: 7.87b | R: 9.a,b | |||
R: 105.74b | P + R: 7.83b | P + R: 8.95b | |||
V: 100.06b | V: 7.77b | V: 8.79b | |||
Two-way ANOVA G × T | G × T: P = 0.7575 | G × T: P = 0.2168 | G × T: P = 0.7762 | G × T: P = 0.8461 |
Data represent average ± SD; n = 7–14 mice/group. Nmp4, nuclear matrix protein 4; WT, wild type; V/VEH, vehicle; R/RAL, raloxifene; P/PTH, parathyroid hormone; P/PTH + R/RAL, and parathyroid hormone + raloxifene; BV/TV, bone volume per total volume. Statistical analyses were performed using two-way ANOVA tests setting genotype (G) and treatment (T) as the independent variables. Statistical significance was set at P ≤ 0.05. The statistical results list the cohorts by genotype, treatment, and genotype × treatment.
a b cCohorts not connected by the same letter are statistically different; the average value of the specific parameter precedes the letter.