Table 2.

Details of minor allele frequency (MAF) correlations between individual‐based approaches (i.e., GBS and Rapture) and Pool‐seq overlapped SNPs datasets

	GAS	LOB	SID	SJH	THE	TRI
GBS versus
Pool replicate 1	0.86	0.85	0.87	0.92	0.64	0.85
Pool replicate 2	0.86	0.88	0.86	0.88	0.84	0.88
Pool replicate 3	0.86	0.85	0.86	0.91	0.86	0.86
Pool replicate 4	0.85	0.80	0.84	–	–	0.87
Average	0.86	0.85	0.86	0.90	0.78	0.87
Rapture versus
Pool replicate 1	0.84	0.84	0.87	0.89	0.61	0.84
Pool replicate 2	0.85	0.87	0.85	0.86	0.82	0.87
Pool replicate 3	0.85	0.84	0.85	0.88	0.84	0.84
Pool replicate 4	0.85	0.78	0.83	–	–	0.86
Average	0.85	0.83	0.85	0.88	0.76	0.85

Values represent MAF correlations between individual‐based data and each Pool‐seq replicate distributed for each sampling site (columns). Sampling site codes are detailed in the Figure 1 (i.e., sampling map). All correlation values were significant (p‐value < 10⁻⁴) and calculated from the Pearson method. Note the weaker correlation for Pool replicate 1 for the THE population.