Skip to main content
. 2019 May 16;9(11):6693–6707. doi: 10.1002/ece3.5248

Table 3.

Linear mixed‐effects models predicting shorebird chick growth indices (see text for definition) in relation to seasonal hatch date, temperature (temp), percentage of days with precipitation (precip%), wind speed (wind), and invertebrate biomass (invert biomass) near Utqiaġvik, Alaska, 2013–2016

Modela K b ΔAICc c wi d
Dunlin
Seasonal hatch date + invert biomass 3 0.0 0.65
Seasonal hatch date*invert biomass 4 2.8 0.16
Invert biomass 2 4.8 0.06
Invert biomass + precip% 3 5.6 0.04
Temp*seasonal hatch date 4 6.5 0.03
Intercept 1 13.4 0.00
Pectoral Sandpiper
Invert biomass 2 0.0 0.77
Seasonal hatch date 2 3.9 0.11
Temp + invert biomass 3 5.6 0.05
Temp*invert biomass 4 6.5 0.03
Wind*seasonal hatch date 4 7.4 0.02
Intercept 1 28.6 0.00
Red Phalarope
Seasonal hatch date 2 0.0 0.73
Seasonal hatch date + temp 3 4.5 0.08
Seasonal hatch date + invert biomass 3 4.9 0.06
Seasonal hatch date + wind 3 5.4 0.05
Seasonal hatch date + precip% 3 5.5 0.05
Intercept 1 19.4 0.00
a

Only the top five models and intercept‐only model are shown.

b

Number of parameters.

c

Difference between model's Akaike's Information Criterion corrected for sample size (AICc) and the lowest AICc value.

d

AICc relative weight attributed to model.