Education |
Yes, since it was practicable, as there was time available to teach PLWHA about the benefits of PA; about simple and cheap home-based exercises; about the barriers to PA and how to deal with them; as well as about the social support and self-efficacy for PA. |
[43, 46, 48, 50, 52] |
Persuasion |
Yes, since it was likely to add value to the intervention. However, none of the researchers were trained to apply persuasive messages to motivate participants into adopting PA. |
None of the studies |
Incentivisation |
Yes, since the use of incentives can motivate participants to adhere to the intervention. Food and fruit packs could be used for incentivising. |
[49] |
Coercion |
No, since it does not stimulate the desired autonomous behaviour and can have legislative implications. |
None of the studies |
Training |
Yes, since it was practicable, as there was time to impart exercising skills to participants. Training could be used to teach participants simple home-based exercises or simple exercises to do at the community centre. |
[48] |
Restriction |
No, since it was not practicable, as there was not enough opportunities to apply this intervention function. Resources available did not permit the employment of this function in the intervention. |
None of the studies |
Environmental restructuring |
No, the theoretical frameworks informing the intervention (SCT and TTM) did not allow use of this intervention function (it applies to the Socioecological Model). |
[52] |
Modelling |
Yes, it was practicable to demonstrate how to do the simple home-based exercises and exercises at the community centre. |
[46, 48] |
Enablement |
Yes, it was practicable in order to increase the means for PA participation and reduce the barriers. |
[44, 46, 47, 49, 51–53, 67] |
SELECTED INTERVENTION FUNCTIONS: Education; incentivisation; training; modelling; enablement |