Table 2.
Xenograft Model | Antitumor Activity | Human NRP1 Expression | Correlation of efficacy to NRP1 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTD | ½ MTD | ¼ MTD | |||
MIA PaCa-2 | ++++ | – | nd | low | yes |
BxPC3 | ++ | – | nd | low | yes |
PC-3 | ++++ | ++++ | ++ | high | yes |
SK-N-MC | – | nd | nd | low | yes |
TC-71 | – | nd | nd | low | yes |
MDA-MB-231 | ++++ | + | + | high | yes |
HT-1080 | +++ | ++ | – | high | yes |
U-87 MG | +++ | ++ | +/− | high | yes |
COLO 320DM | +/− | – | nd | low | yes |
Hs 695 T | ++++ | +++ | + | lowa | no |
CFPAC-1 | + | – | – | lowb | yesb |
LOX IMVI | ++ | – | – | high | no |
HCT 116 | nd | – | nd | low | yes |
aNRP1 expressed at high level in cell line was lost in tumors
bhigh NRP1 expression in tumor lysate by western subsequently deemed predominantly stromal by IHC; CFPAC-1 tumor cells had low NRP1 staining, a likely explanation for poor ER-472 therapeutic activity