Skip to main content
. 2018 May 23;28(2):152–160. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054152

Table 1.

Tobacco products (n=20) assessed by the sensory panel

No Type Brand Expected flavour
Expected non-flavoured products (reference products) 1 Cigarette Cig-RP1 Tobacco
2 Cigarette Cig-RP2 Tobacco
3 Cigarette Cig-RP3 Tobacco
4 Cigarette Cig-RP4 Tobacco
5 Cigarette Cig-RP5 Tobacco
6 Cigarette Cig-RP6 Tobacco
7 Roll-your-own RYO-RP1 Tobacco
8 Roll-your-own RYO-RP2 Tobacco
9 Cigarette without additives Coresta Monitor 6 (CM6) Tobacco
10 Leaves Virginia Tobacco
11 Leaves Burley Tobacco
12 Leaves Oriental Tobacco
Expected flavoured products (test products) 13 Cigarette Cig-TP1 Menthol
14 Cigarette Cig-TP2 Menthol
15 Cigarette Cig-TP3 Other (potential) flavour*
16 Cigarette Cig-TP4 Vanilla
17 Cigarette Cig-TP5 Cherry
18 Cigarette Cig-TP6 Other (potential) flavour*
19 Cigarette Cig-TP7 Other (potential) flavour*
20 Roll-your-own RYO-TP1 Vanilla

*These products were considered potentially flavoured: even though no particular flavour was mentioned, the product name was flavour-related (Cig-TP3), the ingredient list showed high levels of flavoured additives (Cig-TP6) or the package had a bright appealing colour (Cig-TP7).

Cig, cigarette; RYO, roll-your-own; RP, reference product; TP, test  product.