Skip to main content
Frontiers in Genetics logoLink to Frontiers in Genetics
. 2019 Jun 11;10:536. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00536

Effects of Anthocyanin Supplementation on Serum Lipids, Glucose, Markers of Inflammation and Cognition in Adults With Increased Risk of Dementia – A Pilot Study

Anne Katrine Bergland 1,2,*, Hogne Soennesyn 1, Ingvild Dalen 3, Ana Rodriguez-Mateos 4, Rolf Kristian Berge 5, Lasse Melvaer Giil 6, Lawrence Rajendran 7, Richard Siow 8, Michele Tassotti 4,9, Alf Inge Larsen 2,10, Dag Aarsland 1,7
PMCID: PMC6581024  PMID: 31244884

Abstract

Background

Anthocyanins may protect against cardiovascular related cognitive decline and dementia.

Objective

Open-label study to measure changes in serum lipids, glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and markers of inflammation after anthocyanin supplementation in people with increased risk of dementia. As a secondary endpoint we examined potential changes in a battery of cognitive test in the anthocyanin group (AG). A total of 27 individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (n = 8) or stable non-obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) (n = 19) consumed two Medox® capsules, each containing 80 mg of natural purified anthocyanins, twice daily for 16 weeks. They provided blood samples and performed a short battery of cognitive tests. Twenty healthy normal controls (NC) (n = 20) provided blood samples, but did not receive any intervention and did not perform cognitive tests.

Results

There was a significant difference between groups for monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP-1) and fasting glucose. In addition, total cholesterol and triglycerides were significantly increased in the AG. Improvements in memory and executive test scores were observed. No adverse effects were reported.

Conclusion

The results of this pilot study were largely inconclusive with regard to the potential protective effects of anthocyanin supplementation. However, anthocyanins were well tolerated, and compliance was high. Larger, placebo-controlled studies to explore the potential effects of anthocyanins on dementia risk are encouraged.

Clinical Trial Registration

www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02409446

Keywords: mild cognitive impairment, MCI, anthocyanins, lipids, inflammation markers

Introduction

Anthocyanins, a subclass of the flavonoids, are found in foods such as berries and fruits and information regarding their content in food can be found in an online phenol-explorer (Neveu et al., 2010). Anthocyanins have been shown in previous studies to have a number of positive health effects, such as improving the blood lipid profile (Qin et al., 2009; Li et al., 2015), and also fasting serum glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in diabetic patients (Li et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2017), and have anti-inflammatory effects (Xia et al., 2007; Spencer et al., 2012; Spagnuolo et al., 2017). Anthocyanins can improve endothelial and vascular function (Rodriguez-Mateos et al., 2013, 2016, 2019), and can cross the blood–brain barrier (Faria et al., 2014) and thus may reduce neurodegenerative and cerebrovascular changes and possibly protect against cognitive decline and dementia. Interestingly, some studies have found that food-based anthocyanins can improve memory functioning in older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI; Krikorian et al., 2010a,b; Hein et al., 2019). However, these studies were based on relatively small samples, and had a short duration. In addition, food-based anthocyanin supplementation leads to heterogeneity, i.e., variations in types of food sources, concentration, and dose of anthocyanins.

In this exploratory open-label pilot study, we aimed as a primary endpoint to examine potential changes in dementia-relevant mechanisms after 16 weeks of treatment with purified anthocyanin containing capsules, in people with increased risk of dementia. As a secondary endpoint we also explored the potential change in a battery of cognitive tests.

Materials and Methods

Material

Participants were recruited from the outpatient Memory and Cardiology clinics at Stavanger University Hospital in Norway during 2015 and 2016. Eligible for this study were patients with MCI or mild dementia and/or stable non-obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Potential participants identified at the respective outpatient clinics were contacted for a telephone interview by a study doctor, regarding inclusion and exclusion criteria. Participants were also recruited from the dementia disease initiation (DDI) study (Fladby et al., 2017). Inclusion criteria were age ≥50 years and being on stable medication, including nutraceuticals for the past 3 months, and either (a) confirmed CAD without physiologically significant stenosis evaluated by coronary angiography, or (b) having MCI or mild dementia according to ICD 10 (World Health Organization [WHO], 1992).

Exclusion criteria were moderate to severe dementia [operationalized as a mini-mental status exam (MMSE) (Folstein et al., 1975) score < 24], clinically significant depression [15–item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15) (Mitchell et al., 2010) score ≥ 7], unstable CAD, heart failure in need of treatment, having taken Medox® during the past 3 months, using Warfarin, heparin or non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC), inflammatory illnesses such as rheumatoid arthritis and other severe illness with <5 years expected survival. Any treatment with vitamins, minerals or nutraceuticals had to have remained stable for the last 3 months prior to inclusion and during the study. Healthy normal controls (NC) (n = 20) recruited from the staff at Stavanger University Hospital and through acquaintances, were ≥50 years, had stable medication, and had not been taking Medox® for the last 3 months. This group provided blood samples at inclusion and 16 weeks later, but did not take Medox® or other interventions, and did not perform the cognitive test battery. The rationale for including this comparison group was to have a reference group with respect to any observed changes in the blood analyses in the intervention group.

Ethics Statement

All participants provided written informed consent, and the study has been approved by the Regional Ethics Committee (Approval 2014/1966). The study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02409446).

Intervention, Design, and Assessment

Intervention

The participants were given open-label Medox® capsules, provided free of charge by the manufacturer Medpalett AS, Sandnes, Norway. Medox® capsules, which contain specific quantities of natural purified anthocyanins from bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus) and blackcurrant (Ribes nigrum), have been used previously in human studies (Karlsen et al., 2007). The production of the Medox® capsule (Hassellund et al., 2013), and its anthocyanin content (Qin et al., 2009) have been described previously.

The capsules were dispensed at inclusion in the study, and the participants were instructed to consume two 80 mg anthocyanin capsules twice daily for a total daily intake of 320 mg anthocyanins for 16 weeks. This dosage was chosen because it has previously been shown to have biological effects (Qin et al., 2009; Zhu et al., 2011; Li et al., 2015) and found to be safe in use (Qin et al., 2009). A review found that doses up to 640 mg/day showed no adverse events (Wallace et al., 2016).

Participants were instructed to maintain their dietary and lifestyle habits in order to avoid interferences in the study results.

Design and Assessment

At inclusion, all participants underwent a physical examination, including standardized blood pressure measurement, electrocardiogram (ECG), and blood tests. In addition a cognitive test battery (see below) was administered, including the MMSE and GDS-15. Following standardized procedures, participants provided blood samples in the morning after having been fasting for at least 8 h, before and after 16 weeks of treatment. They were contacted by telephone after 8 weeks regarding safety and compliance.

Blood Sampling and Analyses

Blood was collected, centrifugated, and stored at −80 °C until analysis according to standardized procedures. The serum samples were analyzed for lipids (total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL- and LDL cholesterol) and fasting glucose using Architect c16000 TM (Abbott Diagnostics, Chicago, IL, United States) and HbA1c using Variant II turbo (BioRad, Hercules, CA, United States) at Stavanger University Hospital.

Markers of inflammation were analyzed after completion of the study by The Lipid Research Group, Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. Concentrations of cytokines were measured in serum using the Bio-Plex ProTM Human Cytokine 8-plex assay (Cat.: M50000007A) which included GM-CSF, IFN-γ, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, and TNF-α, in addition to five Bio-Plex Pro Human Cytokine single-plexes: MCP-1 (Cat.: 171B5021M), RANTES (Cat.: 171B5025M), G-CSF (Cat.: 171B5017M), IL-17 (Cat.: 171B5014M), and IL-Iβ (Cat.:171B5001M). All plexes were manufactured by Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA, United States). The cytokines were detected by the Bio-PlexTM 200 System and determined with the Bio-Plex Manager Software 6.1. The samples were prepared as described in the protocol (Cat.: 10014905) with a dilution factor of three.

Anthocyanin metabolites were measured in plasma after completion of the study at Department of Nutritional Sciences, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, King’s College London, using a method based on microelution solid phase extraction followed by liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry, using authentic standards, as previously described with some modifications (Feliciano et al., 2016). The detection of plasma (poly)phenol metabolites was performed on a ExactiveTM Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, CA, United States) after separation on an Accela 1250 pump UHPLC system (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, CA, United States). The autosampler injected 5 μL of each sample in a Zorbax Eclipse Plus RRHD column 2.1 mm × 50 mm, 1.8 m with a compatible Eclipse Plus guardcolumn 2.1 mm × 5 mm, 1.8 m (Agilent, Waldbronn, Germany). The mobile phase consisted of 0.1% HCOOH (solvent A) and acetonitrile with 0.1% HCOOH (solvent B) in a 10 min gradient program. Quantification analysis of the plasma (poly)phenols was done using Xcalibur 2.2 (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, CA, United States).

Cognitive Tests

Verbal memory function was assessed using the Norwegian adaptation of the Ten Word List Learning and Recall from the CERAD battery (Morris et al., 1989), a three part test; word list learning, word list delayed recall, and word list delayed recognition.

Executive functioning was assessed by the Trail Making Test (TMT) A and B (Reitan and Wolfson, 1985) and Stroop Golden (Golden, 1976). The Trail Making Tests A and B are tests of psychomotor speed and attention shifting (Ashendorf et al., 2008), while Stroop Golden is a test used to evaluate cognitive speed and inhibition (Scarpina and Tagini, 2017).

Safety

Participants were contacted by phone at week 8 to ask about potential side-effects and adverse events (AE).

The safety blood tests included hemoglobin, thrombocytes, kidney function and liver function tests, which were measured at both baseline and study-end.

Compliance

Participants were contacted by phone at week 8 and asked about adherence to the protocol. Specifically, they were asked whether they had been taking Medox® capsules as instructed, and they were reminded about keeping the empty blister packages. Protocol adherence was also assessed by collecting and counting the empty blister packages and left-over capsules at study-end.

Statistical Analyses

Descriptive statistics are presented as medians and interquartile ranges (IQR), and illustrated using Box plots. Most data were not normally distributed and thus the main analyses were non-parametric. The Mann–Whitney U test and the Chi-square test were used for between-group comparisons. Changes from baseline to follow-up at 24 weeks within groups were analyzed with the Wilcoxon Signed Rank test. For all tests p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Supplementary parametric analyses were performed, from which we present means, standard deviations (SD), and p-values from paired and independent samples t-tests.

The IBM SPSS statistical package version 24 was used for all statistical analyses.

Results

During the period May 2015 to September 2016, 33 participants started anthocyanin supplementation, of whom 27 (8 MCI and 19 CAD) completed the study (6 were excluded for administrative and logistical reasons) (Figure 1). The NC were included in the period December 2016 to February 2017. No subjects with mild dementia were included.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Enrolment of participants. N, number.

Baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics.

Active (n = 27) Controls (n = 20)
Median (IQR) Median (IQR)
Women, count (%) 9 (33) 11 (55)
Age (years) 61 (55–70) 58 (55–62)
CAD, count (%) 19 (70)
Education (years) 11.5 (10–14)
BMI 27.7 (26.0–30.3)
Lipid lowering therapy, count (%) 19 (70)
Acetylsalicylic acid, count (%) 17 (63)
Oral antidiabetic treatment count (%) 3 (11)
Dietary supplement, count (%) 18 (67)

CAD, coronary artery disease; BMI, body mass index; IQR, interquartile range.

Only IL-8, MCP-1, CCL-5/RANTES [regulated on activation, normal T-cell expressed and secreted (RANTES)] and TNF were available for statistical analyses, as the other inflammation markers did not reach measurement thresholds. The findings are summarized in Table 2 and Supplementary Figures S1S3.

TABLE 2.

Changes from baseline to 16 weeks follow-up in serum variables, for participants with supplementation (active) and for control participants.

Active (n = 27) Control (n = 20) Active vs. Control



Median (IQR) p* Median (IQR) p* p#
Cholesterol (mmol/L) Cholesterol
Pre 4.0 (3.1 to 5.5) 5.1 (4.5 to 5.5)
Post 4.6 (3.3 to 6.0) 5.1 (4.6 to 5.6)
Diff 0.2 (0.1 to 0.7) 0.009 0.1 (−0.2 to 0.5) 0.29 0.34
HDL (mmol/L) HDL
Pre 1.2 (1.0 to 1.4) 1.5 (1.1 to 1.7)
Post 1.2 (1.1 to 1.5) 1.4 (1.2 to 1.8)
Diff 0.0 (−0.1 to 0.1) 0.81 0.1 (−0.1 to 0.1) 0.21 0.23
LDL (mmol/L) LDLn = 19
Pre 2.4 (1.8 to 3.9) 3.3 (2.9 to 3.9)
Post 3.0 (1.8 to 4.3) 3.3 (2.8 to 4.0)
Diff 0.1 (−0.1 to 0.3) 0.21 0.0 (−0.1 to 0.4) 0.62 0.72
Triglycerides (mmol/L) Triglycerides
Pre 1.0 (0.7 to 1.4) 0.9 (0.6 to 1.3)
Post 1.0 (0.7 to 1.7) 0.9 (0.6 to 1.8)
Diff 0.1 (0.7 to 1.7) 0.016 0.0 (−0.1 to 0.4) 0.072 0.84
Fasting glucose (mmol/L) Fasting glucose
Pre 5.4 (4.9 to 5.6) 5.3 (5.0 to 5.6)
Post 5.5 (5.3 to 6.3) 5.0 (4.8 to 5.7)
Diff 0.2 (−0.1 to 0.4) 0.058 −0.2 (−0.4 to −0.03) 0.009 0.003
HbA1c (%) HbA1c
Pre 5.8 (5.6 to 6.1) 5.6 (5.4 to 5.8)
Post 5.8 (5.6 to 6.1) 5.4 (5.2 to 5.6)
Diff 0.0 (−0.1 to 0.1) 0.87 −0.05 (−0.2 to 0.0) 0.057 0.26
IL-8 (mmol/L) IL−8
Pre 9.0 (7.7 to 10.3) 7.5 (7.2 to 8.4)
Post 9.2 (6.9 to 11.1) 7.8 (7.2 to 8.9)
Diff 0.0 (−1.5 to 1.2) 0.80 0.2 (−1.0 to 1.5) 0.79 0.71
MCP-1 (pg/mL) MCP-1
Pre 42.2 (10.3 to 59.4) 51.7 (40.9 to 70.2)
Post 41.3 (11.1 to 60.2) 52.8 (45.1 to 93.7)
Diff 0.0 (−5.4 to 1.7) 0.55 1.9 (0.2 to 17.5) 0.014 0.011
RANTES (pg/mL) RANTES
Pre 9206 (8172 to 9833) 8800 (8370 to 9761)
Post 8918 (8046 to 9942) 9164 (8651 to 10027)
Diff −161 (−730 to 677) 0.81 19.09 (−633 to 1105) 0.41 0.41
TNFa (pg/mL) TNFan = 19
Pre 10.1 (7.8 to 13.3) 6.5 (6.1 to 10.9)
Post 9.9 (6.5 to 13.9) 8.0 (5.8 to 11.4)
Diff 0.9 (−2.8 to 2.9) 0.74 −0.4 (−1.5 to 3.9) 0.66 0.95

RANTES; CCL-5/RANTES (regulated on activation, normal T-cell expressed and secreted); Diff, median difference between baseline and follow up serum measurements; IQR, interquartile range; mmol/L, millimol/liter; pg/mL, picomol/liter. *The within group difference from baseline to study end.#The between group differences for Δ (difference from baseline to study end).

The only significant between-group difference was for difference were for ΔMCP-1 (difference from baseline to study end) (p = 0.011) and Δfasting glucose (p = 0.003) (Table 2).

When analyzing the groups separately, significant increases were found in total cholesterol and triglycerides in the anthocyanin supplementation group (AG) from baseline to study end (Table 2), and MCP-1 which increased in the NC group (Table 2).

No significant changes were found for fasting glucose and HbA1c in the AG group.

A total of 29 plasma anthocyanin metabolites were quantified (Table 3 and Supplementary Figure S4). When comparing the two groups, a statistically significant difference was found for two metabolites (o-Coumaric acid and Dihydroferulic acid-4-O-Sulfate), which both had a larger decrease in the AG than in the NC group (Table 3).

Table 3.

Changes from baseline to 16 weeks follow-up in plasma anthocyanin metabolites, for participants with supplementation (active) and for control participants.

Active (n = 27)
Control (n = 20)
Active vs. control
nmol/L Median (IQR) p Median (IQR) p p#
Methylpyrogallol-O-sulfate
Pre 33.1 (17.5 to 52.5) 26.2 (10.2 to 67.6)
Post 45.5 (24.1 to 104.2) 20.6 (7 to 65.3)
Diff 15.6 (−3.3 to 70.7) 0.068 −1.7 (−23.8 to 13.0) 0.85 0.14
Pyrogallol-2-O-sulfate
Pre 36.4 (17.2 to 110.5) 58.4 (20.4 to 102.4)
Post 63.8 (41.5 to 199.1) 35.2 (21.2 to 93.1)
Diff 17.5 (−8.3 to 106.4) 0.001 −12.3 (−82.4 to 32.1) 0.41 0.89
Protocatechuic acid-3-O-sulfate
Pre 3.5 (0.3 to 11.1) 5.4 (1.6 to 10.1)
Post 11.0 (5.5 to 26.5) 6.5 (0.3 to 16.4)
Diff 6.2 (0.0 to 21.6) 0.007 0.8 (−6.3 to 10.1) 0.81 0.071
1-Methylpyrogallol-O-sulfate
Pre 44.7 (29.2 to 77.3) 60.8 (34.8 to 123)
Post 52.7 (33.6 to 97.2) 71.8 (30.3 to 106)
Diff 12.8 (−19.6 to 32.7) 0.14 10.4 (−27.8 to 65.5) 0.60 0.70
4-Methylgallic-3-O-sulfate
Pre 14.0 (5.6 to 23.8) 13.1 (8.5 to 28.7)
Post 12.8 (7.1 to 24.6) 12.3 (7.3 to 21.1)
Diff 1.6 (−7.8 to 14.3) 0.65 −5.5 (−15.6 to 12.0) 0.35 0.25
4-Hydroxybenzoic acid-O-sulfate
Pre 2027 (1211 to 4284) 2664 (1455 to 3764)
Post 1704 (772 to 3597) 1723 (420 to 4354)
Diff −97 (−1039 to 234) 0.14 −924 (−2691 to 1046) 0.26 0.67
4-Hydroxyhippuric acid
Pre 164 (93 to 272) 145 (117 to 275)
Post 123 (94 to 283) 111 (91 to 163)
Diff 6 (−84 to 44) 0.84 −33 (−236 to 33) 0.079 0.21
Protocatechuic acid
Pre 57.5 (22.0 to 106.8) 66.6 (35.5 to 127)
Post 51.3 (29.4 to 114.2) 48.7 (5.0 to 76.9)
Diff 1.6 (−49.7 to 51.3) 0.75 −22.0 (−85.2 to 17.2) 0.049 0.057
Pyrogallol-1-O-sulfate
Pre 25.6 (15.3 to 61.2) 55.1 (25.3 to 106.5)
Post 52.9 (25.5 to 97.6) 63.8 (41.4 to 94.4)
Diff 18.8 (1.5 to 68.4) 0.006 −2.9 (−36.3 to 45.7) 0.85 0.093
3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic acid
Pre 174 (100 to 237) 122 (85 to 197)
Post 106 (84 to 213) 98 (75 to 163)
Diff −26 (−135 to 69) 0.20 −33 (−67 to 2) 0.044 0.97
Catechol-O-sulfate
Pre 5518 (2718 to 8056) 5986 (4284 to 7527)
Post 4640 (3183 to 7843) 4690 (3576 to 5627)
Diff 367 (−2569 to 1608) 0.61 −937 (−3502 to 2010) 0.25 0.67
Vanillic acid-4-O-sulfate
Pre 30.6 (9.5 to 47.8) 24.6 (9.6 to 39.6)
Post 26.2 (9.8 to 42.3) 22.6 (7.9 to 34.7)
Diff −6.5 (−27.6 to 10.8) 0.20 −5.2 (−15.0 to 23.8) 1.0 0.41
3-Hydroxyhippuric acid
Pre 709 (191 to 3060) 451 (269 to 1343)
Post 339 (63 to 1233) 162 (35 to 599)
Diff −503 (−1246 to −55) 0.002 −183 (−1117 to 196) 0.10 0.28
p-Coumaric acid-4-O-β-D-glucuronide
Pre 0.29 (0.00 to 0.52) 0.23 (0.00 to 0.46)
Post 0.21 (0.11 to 0.41) 0.17 (0.00 to 0.30)
Diff −0.07 (−0.26 to 0.24) 0.92 0.01 (−0.20 to 0.20) 0.94 0.84
Isovanillic acid-3-O-sulfate
Pre 2.3 (0.0 to 8.3) 5.5 (0.0 to 19.1)
Post 2.8 (0.0 to 11.3) 5.7 (0.3 to 14.4)
Diff 0.0 (−3.5 to 11.3) 0.90 −1.1 (−10.6 to 3.6) 0.50 0.48
Catechol-O-1-glucuronide
Pre 1.7 (0.0 to 9.2) 2.2 (0.1 to 8.0?)
Post 4.6 (1.6 to 14.2) 1.1 (0.1 to 6.6)
Diff 1.5 (−1.5 to 8.8) 0.075 0.1 (−2.2 to 1.7) 0.97 0.14
Ferulic acid-4-O-β-D-glucuronide
Pre 4.3 (0.4 to 33.4) 7.7 (1.0 to 19.4)
Post 19.4 (2.6 to 59.3) 5.8 (1.1 to 21.5)
Diff 5.5 (0.2 to 31.4) 0.013 −0.3 (−5.9 to 15.4) 0.98 0.064
Hippuric acid
Pre 17680 (9444 to 55008) 24075 (11958 to 39646)
Post 15225 (8654 to 40673) 12211 (11086 to 28936)
Diff −3572 (−18398 to 1041) 0.068 −2788 (−15907 to 4975) 0.33 0.68
4-Methylcatechol-O-sulfate
Pre 1630 (815 to 3580) 1209 (753 to 1889)
Post 1228 (691 to 2722) 997 (647 to 1899)
Diff −182 (−1087 to 733) 0.47 −221 (−617 to 255) 0.28 0.95
4-Hydroxybenzaldehyde
Pre 72.6 (40.3 to 130) 81.2 (58.4 to 105)
Post 53.5 (48.9 to 93.3) 48.7 (39.5 to 75.5)
Diff −24.8 (−56.1 to 6.5) 0.029 −34.3 (−52.8 to −6.8) 0.019 0.78
Ferulic acid-4-O-sulfate
Pre 2.3 (0.5 to 7.0) 4.0 (0.0 to 12.3)
Post 1.9 (0.8 to 23.8) 6.1 (1.6 to 9.7)
Diff 0.5 (−2.9 to 21.1) 0.20 1.1 (−7.7 to 9.1) 0.55 0.69
Dihydroisoferulic acid-3-O-sulfate
Pre 7.2 (0.0 to 17.5) 4.9 (0.0 to 14.1)
Post 9.2 (2.1 to 23.7) 7.6 (1.0 to 19.4)
Diff 1.0 (−7.5 to 8.6) 0.47 0.9 (−6.9 to 13.0) 0.69 0.94
Isoferulic acid-3-O-sulfate
Pre 1.1 (0.3 to 2.3) 0.8 (0.4 to 5.7)
Post 4.5 (0.4 to 13.7) 1.5 (0.3 to 8.6)
Diff 0.6 (−1.7 to 10.2) 0.25 0.4 (−1.6 to 2.4) 0.55 0.67
Dihydroisoferulic acid-3-O-β-D-glucuronide
Pre 19.1 (7.2 to 45.7) 25.8 (2.5 to 82.4)
Post 20.7 (8.1 to 60.8) 16.1 (5.4 to 43.4)
Diff 1.2 (−15.4 to 34.5) 0.47 −4.9 (−70.9 to 27.7) 0.55 0.31
Isoferulic acid-3-O-β-D-glucuronide
Pre 22.3 (5.2 to 67.5) 21.2 (1.8 to 54.6)
Post 27.3 (8.5 to 136.4) 21.3 (5.7 to 58.6)
Diff 24.4 (−18.0 to 96.2) 0.044 2.7 (−10.1 to 36.8) 0.55 0.21
Dihydroferulic acid-4-O-sulfate
Pre 3.7 (1.2 to 8.3) 1.9 (0.2 to 3.6)
Post 1.6 (0.9 to 5.1) 2.7 (1.4 to 5.2)
Diff −1.5 (−3.1 to −0.3) 0.006 0.8 (−0.9 to 2.9) 0.31 0.010
3-(3-hydroxyphenyl)propanoic acid
Pre 805 (44 to 2377) 350 (14 to 1479)
Post 470 (72 to 4306) 414 (112 to 1624)
Diff 29 (−495 to 831) 0.43 36 (−917 to 345) 0.74 0.76
m-Coumaric acid
Pre 111 (35 to 146) 84 (63 to 110)
Post 55 (38 to 78) 58 (53 to 85)
Diff −62 (−82 to 16) 0.014 −28 (−58 to 2) 0.093 0.33
o-Coumaric acid
Pre 218 (81 to 356) 125 (81 to 234)
Post 87 (47 to 158) 81 (50 to 162)
Diff −116 (−230 to −35) <0.001 −36 (−111 to −1) 0.006 0.019

Diff, median difference between baseline and follow up plasma measurements; IQR, interquartile range; nmol/L = nanomol/liter. The within group difference from baseline to study end. #The between group differences for Δ (difference from baseline to study end).

In the AG, there was a statistically significant increase in five of the metabolites (Pyrogallol-2-O-sulfate, Protocatechuic acid-3-O-sulfate, Pyrogallol-1-O-sulfate, Ferulic acid-4-O-β-D-glucuronide, Isoferulic_acid-3-O-β-D-glucuronide) and a statistically significant decrease in five other metabolites (3-Hydroxyhippuric acid, 4-Hydroxybenzaldehyde, Dihydroferulic acid-4-O-Sulfate, m-Coumaric acid, o-Coumaric acid) after 16 weeks of anthocyanin consumption in comparison with baseline.

In the NC group, there was a statistically significant decrease in four metabolites (Protocatechuic acid, 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic acid, 4-Hydroxybenzaldehyde and o-Coumaric acid), whereas there were no statistically significant increases in any of the metabolites.

The cognitive test scores improved in the intervention group, with improvements for CERAD learning (p = 0.016), recall (p < 0.001) and recognition (p = 0.047) and for STROOP test word (p < 0.001) and color (p = 0.044) (Table 4 and Supplementary Figures S5S7).

Table 4.

Changes from baseline to 16 weeks follow-up in cognitive variables, for participants with supplementation (active).

Active (n = 27)
Median (IQR) p
CERAD (points) Learning
Pre 20 (16 to 22)
Post 21 (17 to 25)
Diff 2 (−1 to 3) 0.016
Recall
Pre 6 (4 to 8)
Post 7 (5 to 9)
Diff 1 (0 to 2) <0.001
Recognition
Pre 20 (16 to 20)
Post 20 (19 to 20)
Diff 0 (0 to 1) 0.047
TMT A (sec)
Pre 32 (21 to 53)
Post 34 (23 to 39)
Diff −2 (−6 to 2) 0.081
TMT Bn=19 (sec)
Pre 85.50 (62.25 to 118)
Post 69.50 (56 to 100.75)
Diff −2.0 (−19.75 to 2.25) 0.16
STROOP (score) Word
Pre 87 (72 to 67)
Post 87 (80 to 103)
Diff 6 (1 to 10) <0.001
Color
Pre 61 (52 to 67)
Post 62 (54 to 69)
Diff 2 (−1 to 6) 0.044
Word-color
Pre 34 (29 to 41)
Post 34 (28 to 41)
Diff 0 (−3 to 5) 0.67

TMT, Trail Making Test; Diff, median difference between baseline and follow up results in cognitive tests; IQR, interquartile range. The within group difference from baseline to study end.

Overall, findings using parametric analyses differed only marginally from the non-parametric findings reported above (Supplementary Tables S1, S2).

The compliance was good. More than 85% of the participants returned at least 90% of the empty blister packages. The anthocyanins were well tolerated, and none of the participants withdrew due to adverse effects. Blood tests taken for safety reasons were all within a clinically acceptable range. Increased bleeding tendency was not observed.

Discussion

In this pilot study anthocyanin supplementation was well tolerated, without any AE, and the compliance was good. This indicates that larger RCTs might be feasible, to confirm exploratory results in the current pilot study.

Our findings are somewhat inconclusive. While some cognitive improvements were observed in the AG, there were no significant changes in serum levels of some risk factors for dementia; i.e., fasting glucose, HbA1c or pro-inflammatory cytokines. There was a non-significant increase in serum levels of MCP-1 in the AG and a significant increase in the NC during the study period. The between-group difference in Δ serum levels of MCP-1 was statistically significant.

Furthermore, we observed a significant increase in serum levels of total cholesterol and triglycerides in AG. The lipid profile of the NC group did not change significantly, and since we have no information about statin use or use of other lipid lowering medications in the NC group, the observed difference should be interpreted cautiously.

Previous studies using Medox® have shown a statistically significant increase in HDL-cholesterol (Qin et al., 2009; Zhu et al., 2011; Hassellund et al., 2013) and a decrease in LDL-cholesterol (Qin et al., 2009; Zhu et al., 2011). This is of clinical interest, as higher HDL-cholesterol is associated with lower cardiovascular risk (Barter et al., 2007), while high levels of total cholesterol, triglycerides and LDL are associated with higher cardiovascular risk (Stone et al., 2014).

The differences in the findings between our study and these previous studies might be due to differences in participants, as well as in anthocyanin supplementation dose and duration, or other factors. Furthermore, other studies included dyslipidemic and hypercholesterolemic participants not using statins or any other lipid lowering treatment (Qin et al., 2009; Zhu et al., 2011), whereas in our study, the median cholesterol at baseline in the intervention group was 4.0 mmol/l, in addition 70% were taking statins or other lipid lowering medication.

Regarding the inflammation markers, RANTES promotes activation and migration of leukocytes and mediates neuroinflammation and brain microvascular dysfunction (Appay and Rowland-Jones, 2001; Dénes et al., 2010; Yilmaz and Granger, 2010). As there was a significant between-group difference for ΔMCP-1, our results are partly consistent with findings in a randomized, double-blind trial in hypercholesterolemic individuals consuming purified anthocyanins for 24 weeks (Song et al., 2014), and in a parallel-designed, placebo-controlled trial (Karlsen et al., 2007). Other studies did not report a reduction of pro-inflammatory mediators after anthocyanin supplementation (Hassellund et al., 2013; Kent et al., 2015). Therefore, the anti-inflammatory effect of anthocyanins and the potential to reduce neuroinflammation and brain microvascular dysfunction associated with cognitive decline in adults at risk of dementia (Grammas, 2011) should be studied in larger randomized studies.

The beneficial effect of anthocyanins might possibly be due to their degradation products and metabolites (Feliciano et al., 2016) as absorption of intact anthocyanins is reported to be low (Zhong et al., 2017). Rodriguez-Mateos et al. quantified metabolites in plasma after blueberry consumption, and showed that anthocyanin-derived metabolites correlated with in vivo effects (Rodriguez-Mateos et al., 2013, 2019). Furthermore, circulating anthocyanin metabolites were shown to improve vascular function when injected in an in vivo model of vascular function, and cardiovascular benefits after consumption of anthocyanins were linked with anthocyanin metabolites as mediators of change in cellular gene programs (Rodriguez-Mateos et al., 2019).

In our study, we were able to measure a total of 29 anthocyanin metabolites. The results were conflicting, as we found various anthocyanin metabolites to be both significantly increasing and decreasing in the AG. In the NC group as well, we found significant changes. This is in line with findings in another study reporting an increase of some metabolites, and a decrease in others after ingestion of anthocyanins over time (Feliciano et al., 2016). A possible explanation for our results could be high inter-individual variability and the influence of the background diet on the concentration of these compounds in blood, as some of these metabolites could arise from the consumption of other anthocyanin-rich foods such as berries and red wine or other food components in the diet. It is also possible that the results could be related to the handling and analysis of the blood samples. As far as we know, the presence of anthocyanin metabolites in plasma after Medox® use is reported in only one other clinical study, where 8 out of 17 anthocyanin metabolites were found to be significantly increased. However, this was analyzed in blood samples collected 1–3 h after ingestion of the morning dose of anthocyanins (320 mg), and not after daily consumption and an overnight fast (Hassellund et al., 2013).

The improvement on several cognitive tests should be interpreted cautiously due to potential learning effects related to the relatively short test–retest interval, and the lack of a comparison group. Nonetheless, our results are in line with previous smaller studies involving participants with MCI, reporting improved cognition after ingestion of anthocyanins (Krikorian et al., 2010a,b). Our results are also in line with the results of a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study reporting improved episodic memory after 3 months of anthocyanin supplementation (Whyte et al., 2018).

Intake of anthocyanin capsules in the dosage of 320 mg/day appears to be well tolerated and safe. None of the safety blood tests were found to be out of a clinically acceptable range or necessitating medical follow-up after study-end. This is consistent with previous studies (Karlsen et al., 2007; Qin et al., 2009).

The major limitations of this pilot study are the non-randomized open-label design, the small sample size, and the relatively short intervention period. Although all the participants were told not to change their lifestyle during the intervention period, we have no data on this. Further we had no detailed dietary assessment, and thus we cannot exclude the possibility of differences in the background diet between the groups before or during the study. However, the participants were instructed to maintain their dietary and lifestyle habits during the study period, and to take the capsules 30 min before or 120 min after meals, as concomitant ingestion of certain types of food may counteract the effect of flavonoids (Lorenz et al., 2007).

The NC were recruited separately and differed from the participants by being a healthy group that did not receive any intervention, and did not perform cognitive testing. Thus power calculations for further studies might be compromised. However, we provide descriptive statistics including variance measurements which may be helpful in planning sample size in later studies.

An important strength of our study is the well characterized combination of nutraceuticals used, which facilitates comparison with other studies regarding both source of anthocyanins and dosage. Of note, this is, to our knowledge, the first study on cognitive function in adults with increased risk of dementia where Medox® is being used as the source of anthocyanin. Thus our study might also facilitate investigation of the effect of different proprietary blueberry formulatons, shown by Whyte et al. to be of importance (Whyte et al., 2018).

All things considered, adequately powered, randomized studies are warranted to better understand how anthocyanins and their metabolites may affect relevant mechanisms, including their possible protective role in epigenetic modifications that potentially benefit the aging brain and reduce the risk for dementia.

Ethics Statement

All participants provided written informed consent, and the study has been approved by the Regional Ethics Committee (Approval 2014/1966). The study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02409446).

Author Contributions

DA, HS, AB, and AL planned and designed the study. AB conducted the study and collected the data. RB performed the serum analyses. MT and AR-M performed the plasma analyses. AB and ID conducted the statistical analyses. All authors wrote the manuscript and critically reviewed the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Statement

AB has received support for conference participation from Evonik. DA has received research support and/or honoraria from Astra-Zeneca, H. Lundbeck, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, and GE Health, and serves as paid consultant for H. Lundbeck and Axovant. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the research nurses Reidun Sikveland Meling and Jorunn Margrete Nilsen for their contribution in the conduction of the study. We also thank Hellen Svalestad for her contribution to participant recruitment from the cardiology department, and Bjarne Hervik for his contribution in recruiting healthy normal controls.

Footnotes

Funding. This study was financed by a grant from Sandnes Sparebank, Sandnes, Norway and the Norwegian Health Association, grant number 7330. Medpalett, Sandnes, Norway contributed to the study by producing Medox® free of charge. Medpalett had no influence on the design or conduction of the study, the analyses and interpretation of data, or regarding the decision to publish the findings. This paper represents independent research partly funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London. The views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2019.00536/full#supplementary-material

FIGURE S1

Changes from baseline to 16 weeks follow-up in serum lipids, for participants with anthocyanin supplementation. mmol/L, millimole/liter.

FIGURE S2

Changes from baseline to 16 weeks follow-up in serum fasting glucose and HbA1c, for participants with anthocyanin supplementation. HbA1a, glycosylated hemoglobin; mmol/L, millimole/liter.

FIGURE S3

Changes from baseline to 16 weeks follow-up in serum cytokines, for participants with anthocyanin supplementation. RANTES;CCL-5/RANTES (regulated on activation, normal T-cell expressed and secreted). pg/mL, picomolar/milliliter.

FIGURE S4

Changes from baseline to 16 weeks follow-up in plasma anthocyanin metabolites, for participants with and without anthocyanin supplementation. Measurement unit: nmol/L, nanomolar/liter, except for hippuric acid (nmol/10L) and coumaric acid-4-O-β-D-glucuronide (nmol/0.033L).

FIGURE S5

Changes from baseline to 16 weeks follow-up in CERAD.

FIGURE S6

Changes from baseline to 16 weeks follow-up in Trail Making Test (TMT). Sec, seconds.

FIGURE S7

Changes from baseline to 16 weeks follow-up in Stroop test.

TABLE S1

Changes from baseline to 16 weeks follow-up in serum variables, for participants with supplementation (active) and for control participants. Inline graphic, mean; SD, standard deviation; The within group difference from baseline to study end tested with paired-samples t-test. $independent samples t-test for the between group differences for Δ (difference from baseline to study end). #With Welch correction for heteroscedasticity. RANTES;CCL-5/RANTES (regulated on activation, normal T-cell expressed and secreted). Diff, mean difference between baseline and follow up results in serum measurements.

TABLE S2

Changes from baseline to 16 weeks follow-up in cognitive variables, for participants with supplementation (active). Inline graphic, mean; SD, standard deviation; TMT, Trail Making Test; Diff, mean difference between baseline and follow up results in cognitive tests. The within group difference from baseline to study end tested with paired-samples t-test.

References

  1. Appay V., Rowland-Jones S. L. (2001). RANTES: a versatile and controversial chemokine. Trends Immunol. 22 83–87. 10.1016/s1471-4906(00)01812-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ashendorf L., Jefferson A. L., O’connor M. K., Chaisson C., Green R. C., Stern R. A. (2008). Trail making test errors in normal aging, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia. Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol. 23 129–137. 10.1016/j.acn.2007.11.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barter P., Gotto A. M., Larosa J. C., Maroni J., Szarek M., Grundy S. M., et al. (2007). HDL cholesterol, very low levels of LDL cholesterol, and cardiovascular events. N. Engl. J. Med. 357 1301–1310. 10.1056/nejmoa064278 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dénes Á, Humphreys N., Lane T. E., Grencis R., Rothwell N. (2010). Chronic systemic infection exacerbates ischemic brain damage via a CCL5 (regulated on activation, normal T-cell expressed and secreted)-mediated proinflammatory response in mice. J. Neurosci. 30 10086–10095. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1227-10.2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Faria A., Meireles M., Fernandes I., Santos-Buelga C., Gonzalez-Manzano S., Dueñas M., et al. (2014). Flavonoid metabolites transport across a human BBB model. Food Chem. 149 190–196. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.10.095 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Feliciano R. P., Istas G., Heiss C., Rodriguez-Mateos A. J. M. (2016). Plasma and urinary phenolic profiles after acute and repetitive intake of wild blueberry. Molecules 21 1120. 10.3390/molecules21091120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fladby T., Pålhaugen L., Selnes P., Waterloo K., Bråthen G., Hessen E., et al. (2017). Detecting at-risk alzheimer’s disease cases. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 60 97–105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Folstein M. F., Folstein S. E., Mchugh P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J. Psychiatr. Res. 12 189–198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Golden C. J. (1976). Identification of brain disorders by the stroop color and word test. J. Clin. Psychol. 32 654–658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Grammas P. (2011). Neurovascular dysfunction, inflammation and endothelial activation: implications for the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neuroinflamm. 8:26. 10.1186/1742-2094-8-26 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hassellund S., Flaa A., Kjeldsen S., Seljeflot I., Karlsen A., Erlund I., et al. (2013). Effects of anthocyanins on cardiovascular risk factors and inflammation in pre-hypertensive men: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled crossover study. J. Hum. Hypertens. 27 100–106. 10.1038/jhh.2012.4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hein S., Whyte A. R., Wood E., Rodriguez-Mateos A., Williams C. M. (2019). Systematic review of the effects of blueberry on cognitive performance as we age. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Karlsen A., Retterstøl L., Laake P., Paur I., Kjølsrud-Bøhn S., Sandvik L., et al. (2007). Anthocyanins inhibit nuclear factor-κB activation in monocytes and reduce plasma concentrations of pro-inflammatory mediators in healthy adults. J. Nutr. 137 1951–1954. 10.1093/jn/137.8.1951 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kent K., Charlton K., Roodenrys S., Batterham M., Potter J., Traynor V., et al. (2015). Consumption of anthocyanin-rich cherry juice for 12 weeks improves memory and cognition in older adults with mild-to-moderate dementia. Eur. J. Nutr. 56 333–341. 10.1007/s00394-015-1083-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Krikorian R., Nash T. A., Shidler M. D., Shukitt-Hale B., Joseph J. A. (2010a). Concord grape juice supplementation improves memory function in older adults with mild cognitive impairment. Br. J. Nutr. 103 730–734. 10.1017/S0007114509992364 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Krikorian R., Shidler M. D., Nash T. A., Kalt W., Vinqvist-Tymchuk M. R., Shukitt-Hale B., et al. (2010b). Blueberry supplementation improves memory in older adults†. J. Agric. Food Chem. 58 3996–4000. 10.1021/jf9029332 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Li D., Zhang Y., Liu Y., Sun R., Xia M. (2015). Purified anthocyanin supplementation reduces dyslipidemia, enhances antioxidant capacity, and prevents insulin resistance in diabetic patients. J. Nutr. 145 742–748. 10.3945/jn.114.205674 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lorenz M., Jochmann N., Von Krosigk A., Martus P., Baumann G., Stangl K., et al. (2007). Addition of milk prevents vascular protective effects of tea. Eur. Heart J. 28 219–223. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl442 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mitchell A. J., Bird V., Rizzo M., Meader N. (2010). Diagnostic validity and added value of the geriatric depression scale for depression in primary care: a meta-analysis of GDS30 and GDS15. J. Affect. Disord. 125 10–17. 10.1016/j.jad.2009.08.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Morris J. C., Heyman A., Mohs R. C., Hughes J. P., Van Belle G., Fillenbaum G., et al. (1989). The consortium to establish a registry for Alzheimer’s disease (CERAD). Part I. clinical and neuropsychological assessment of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 39 1159–1165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Neveu V., Perez-Jiménez J., Vos F., Crespy V., Du Chaffaut L., Mennen L., et al. (2010). Phenol-explorer: an online comprehensive database on polyphenol contents in foods. Database 2010:ba024. 10.1093/database/bap024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Qin Y., Xia M., Ma J., Hao Y., Liu J., Mou H., et al. (2009). Anthocyanin supplementation improves serum LDL-and HDL-cholesterol concentrations associated with the inhibition of cholesteryl ester transfer protein in dyslipidemic subjects. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 90 485–492. 10.3945/ajcn.2009.27814 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Reitan R., Wolfson D. (1985). The Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery: Therapy and Clinical Assessment. Tucson, AZ: Neuropsychological Press. [Google Scholar]
  24. Rodriguez-Mateos A., Istas G., Boschek L., Feliciano R. P., Mills C. E., Boby C., et al. (2019). Circulating anthocyanin metabolites mediate vascular benefits of blueberries: insights from randomized controlled trials, metabolomics, and nutrigenomics. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Rodriguez-Mateos A., Rendeiro C., Bergillos-Meca T., Tabatabaee S., George T. W., Heiss C., et al. (2013). Intake and time dependence of blueberry flavonoid–induced improvements in vascular function: a randomized, controlled, double-blind, crossover intervention study with mechanistic insights into biological activity. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 98 1179–1191. 10.3945/ajcn.113.066639 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Rodriguez-Mateos A., Feliciano R. P., Boeres A., Weber T., Dos Santos C. N., Ventura M. R., et al. (2016). Cranberry (poly) phenol metabolites correlate with improvements in vascular function: a double-blind, randomized, controlled, dose-response, crossover study. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 60 2130–2140. 10.1002/mnfr.201600250 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Scarpina F., Tagini S. (2017). The stroop color and word test. Front. Psychol. 8:557. 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00557 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Song F., Zhu Y., Shi Z., Tian J., Deng X., Ren J., et al. (2014). Plant food anthocyanins inhibit platelet granule secretion in hypercholesterolaemia: involving the signalling pathway of PI3K–Akt. Thromb. Haemost. 112 981–991. 10.1160/th13-12-1002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Spagnuolo C., Moccia S., Russo G. L. (2017). Anti-inflammatory effects of flavonoids in neurodegenerative disorders. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 153 105–115. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2017.09.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Spencer J. P., Vafeiadou K., Williams R. J., Vauzour D. (2012). Neuroinflammation: modulation by flavonoids and mechanisms of action. Mol. Aspects Med. 33 83–97. 10.1016/j.mam.2011.10.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Stone N. J., Robinson J. G., Lichtenstein A. H., Merz C. N. B., Blum C. B., Eckel R. H., et al. (2014). 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the american college of cardiology/american heart association task force on practice guidelines. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 63 2889–2934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wallace T. C., Slavin M., Frankenfeld C. L. (2016). Systematic review of anthocyanins and markers of cardiovascular disease. Nutrients 8:32. 10.3390/nu8010032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Whyte A., Cheng N., Fromentin E., Williams C. J. N. (2018). A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study to compare the safety and efficacy of low dose enhanced wild blueberry powder and wild blueberry extract (ThinkBlue) in maintenance of episodic and working memory in older adults. Nutrients 10:E660. 10.3390/nu10060660 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. World Health Organization [WHO] (1992). The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders: Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization. [Google Scholar]
  35. Xia M., Ling W., Zhu H., Wang Q., Ma J., Hou M., et al. (2007). Anthocyanin prevents CD40-activated proinflammatory signaling in endothelial cells by regulating cholesterol distribution. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 27 519–524. 10.1161/01.atv.0000254672.04573.2d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Yang L., Ling W., Du Z., Chen Y., Li D., Deng S., et al. (2017). Effects of anthocyanins on cardiometabolic health: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Adv. Nutr. 8 684–693. 10.3945/an.116.014852 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Yilmaz G., Granger D. N. (2010). Leukocyte recruitment and ischemic brain injury. Neuromol. Med. 12 193–204. 10.1007/s12017-009-8074-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Zhong S., Sandhu A., Edirisinghe I., Burton-Freeman I., Research F. (2017). Characterization of wild blueberry polyphenols bioavailability and kinetic profile in plasma over 24-h period in human subjects. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 61:1700405. 10.1002/mnfr.201700405 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhu Y., Xia M., Yang Y., Liu F., Li Z., Hao Y., et al. (2011). Purified anthocyanin supplementation improves endothelial function via NO-cGMP activation in hypercholesterolemic individuals. Clin. Chem. 57 1524–1533. 10.1373/clinchem.2011.167361 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

FIGURE S1

Changes from baseline to 16 weeks follow-up in serum lipids, for participants with anthocyanin supplementation. mmol/L, millimole/liter.

FIGURE S2

Changes from baseline to 16 weeks follow-up in serum fasting glucose and HbA1c, for participants with anthocyanin supplementation. HbA1a, glycosylated hemoglobin; mmol/L, millimole/liter.

FIGURE S3

Changes from baseline to 16 weeks follow-up in serum cytokines, for participants with anthocyanin supplementation. RANTES;CCL-5/RANTES (regulated on activation, normal T-cell expressed and secreted). pg/mL, picomolar/milliliter.

FIGURE S4

Changes from baseline to 16 weeks follow-up in plasma anthocyanin metabolites, for participants with and without anthocyanin supplementation. Measurement unit: nmol/L, nanomolar/liter, except for hippuric acid (nmol/10L) and coumaric acid-4-O-β-D-glucuronide (nmol/0.033L).

FIGURE S5

Changes from baseline to 16 weeks follow-up in CERAD.

FIGURE S6

Changes from baseline to 16 weeks follow-up in Trail Making Test (TMT). Sec, seconds.

FIGURE S7

Changes from baseline to 16 weeks follow-up in Stroop test.

TABLE S1

Changes from baseline to 16 weeks follow-up in serum variables, for participants with supplementation (active) and for control participants. Inline graphic, mean; SD, standard deviation; The within group difference from baseline to study end tested with paired-samples t-test. $independent samples t-test for the between group differences for Δ (difference from baseline to study end). #With Welch correction for heteroscedasticity. RANTES;CCL-5/RANTES (regulated on activation, normal T-cell expressed and secreted). Diff, mean difference between baseline and follow up results in serum measurements.

TABLE S2

Changes from baseline to 16 weeks follow-up in cognitive variables, for participants with supplementation (active). Inline graphic, mean; SD, standard deviation; TMT, Trail Making Test; Diff, mean difference between baseline and follow up results in cognitive tests. The within group difference from baseline to study end tested with paired-samples t-test.


Articles from Frontiers in Genetics are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES