Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun;29(6):969–977. doi: 10.1101/gr.245399.118

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Comparison of methods. (A) Omni-ATAC-seq and mATAC-seq share a majority of peaks. (B) Features at peaks are similar for mATAC-seq and Omni-ATAC-seq. (C,D) Accessibility in mATAC-seq is comparable to Omni-ATAC-seq at gene bodies ±2 kb, n = 21,305. (E,F) Methylation reported by mATAC is comparable to WGBS at gene bodies ±2 kb, n = 21,305, although WGBS includes data absent from mATAC.