Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 11;73(4):370–376. doi: 10.1136/jech-2018-211746

Table 3.

Effect of eligibility to the 1959 Berthoin reform on health outcomes by gender in the 2012 Constances study (n=18 929)

Men Women
β 95% CI OR 95% CI β 95% CI OR 95% CI
Cognitive score 0.15 0.06 to 0.24 1.81 1.26 to 2.66 −0.01 −0.13 to 0.12 0.84 0.60 to 1.13
CES-D score 0.22 −0.73 to 1.17 1.05 0.83 to 1.32 1.52 0.33 to 2.71 1.27 1.05 to 1.54
Hand grip strength 0.07 −0.88 to 1.02 1.02 0.82 to 1.27 −0.73 −1.51 to 0.05 0.07 0.01 to 1.04
Finger tapping −0.55 −1.95 to 0.85 0.89 0.65 to 1.21 0.05 −1.37 to 1.47 1.30 0.86 to 1.99
Walking speed −0.01 −0.05 to 0.02 0.74 0.53 to 1.02 0.02 −0.02 to 0.06 1.04 0.76 to 1.43

ORs measure the odds of being in the top quartile of cognitive and physical functioning and of reporting elevated depressive symptoms based on the CES-D recommended cut-off. All models control for age, age squared, month of birth, birth cohort relative to the cut-off point, interacted with the treatment. Standard errors are clustered at the month of birth level. The bandwidth is fixed at 48 months.

CES-D, Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression score.