Skip to main content
. 2019 May 6;46(6):2669–2682. doi: 10.1002/mp.13553

Table 4.

Comparison of segmentation accuracy between the state‐of‐the‐art methods and our method (DSC %)

Organ/Method Han6 Mannion41 Ibragimov21 Wang11 Tong24 SC‐GAN‐DenseNet (proposed)
Brainstem 82 87 ± 4 Unavailable 90.3 ± 3.8 86.97 ± 2.95 86.72 ± 2.92
Optical chiasm Unavailable 35 ± 16 37.4 ± 13.4 Unavailable 58.35 ± 10.28a 59.16 ± 9.76
Mandible 89 93 ± 1 89.5 ± 3.6 94.4 ± 1.3 93.67 ± 1.21 93.91 ± 1.32
Left optical nerve Unavailable 63 ± 5 63.9 ± 6.9 Unavailable 65.31 ± 5.75a 66.38 ± 4.83
Right optical nerve Unavailable 63 ± 5 64.5 ± 7.5 Unavailable 68.89 ± 4.74a 69.91 ± 4.38
Left parotid 82 84 ± 7 76.6 ± 6.1 82.3 ± 5.2 83.49 ± 2.29a 85.49 ± 1.78
Right parotid 82 84 ± 7 77.9 ± 5.4 82.9 ± 6.1 83.18 ± 1.45a 85.77 ± 2.44
Left submandibular 69 78 ± 8 69.7 ± 13.3 Unavailable 75.48 ± 6.49a 80.65 ± 5.08
Right submandibular 69 78 ± 8 73.0 ± 9.2 Unavailable 81.31 ± 6.45a 81.86 ± 4.96
a

The statistical significance (< 0.05). Bold fonts denote the best performers.