Table 1.
Cluster analysis results and outcomes by cluster
Above half shows cluster centers for each input variable that was used for the clustering analysis. Top defining variables for each cluster are shaded in dark gray. Bottom half shows the breakdown of rehabilitation outcomes for each cluster.
Cluster Name
|
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | D | ||
INPUT variables | |||||
ethnic/racial minority | .25 | .72 | .95 | .24 | |
significant medical hx | .04 | .01 | .45 | .72 | |
elderly | .07 | .17 | .10 | .92 | |
homelessness hx | .29 | .05 | .70 | .00 | |
substance abuse hx | .82 | .11 | 1.00 | .08 | |
incarceration hx | .18 | .05 | .30 | .12 | |
ESL/Non-English Sp | .07 | .21 | .40 | .04 | |
institutionalization hx | .18 | .00 | .30 | .08 | |
psychiatric hx | .71 | .03 | .10 | .28 | |
undocumented | .00 | .12 | .20 | .00 | |
other | .04 | .04 | .00 | .00 | |
| |||||
ANALYSIS variables | |||||
Duration of Stay (days)* | 21.39 | 15.95 | 27.00 | 18.24 | |
FIM gains (Total) | 39.61 | 27.86 | 34.74 | 26.40 | |
FIM gains (Cog)* | 10.9286 | 7.7571 | 9.3158 | 5.2400 | |
FIM gains (Motor) | 28.6786 | 21.3784 | 25.4211 | 21.1600 | |
Discharge Location (χ2 = 12.66, p = .049, n = 148) | |||||
Home | 32.1% | 56.0% | 35.0% | 36.0% | |
Acute / Subacute Care | 53.6% | 42.7% | 55.0% | 60.0% | |
Other | 14.3% | 1.3% | 10.0% | 4.0% | |
Primary person at d/c (χ2 = 8.10, p = .231, n = 148) | |||||
Self / Alone / Other | 6.6% | 5.0% | 4.0% | ||
Family / Friends | 32.1% | 49.3% | 30.0% | 32.0% | |
Facility Care | 67.9% | 44.0% | 65.0% | 64.0% |
indicates significant group differences between clusters based on omnibus ANOVAs, p < .05.