Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Mar 23;60:7–19. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2019.03.017

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

The deviations in MR fingerprinting (MRF) estimated T1 and T2 with fat signal fraction (FSF) in the oil-water phantom. The difference from the consensus T1 estimates for all T1/T2 tube combinations and all measured slices is shown for the proposed k-space fat-water separation (MRF-varTE) and fixed-TE/variable-TR MRF methods without fat-water separation, plotted against FSF estimated from a spoiled gradient echo sequence (a). The changes in T2 versus FSF are plotted in (b).