Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 18;4(4):e00324-18. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00324-18

TABLE 1.

Growth performance and salivary cortisola of pigs ranked on residual feed intake at three geographic locationsb

Parameter Value for groupc
SEMd P value
High RFI
Low RFI
ROI1 ROI2 NI AT ROI1 ROI2 NI AT RFI ×
location
RFI Location
RFI (g/day) 1,237 A 1,108 A 207 B 1,171 AB −1,030 C −737 C −200 C −956 C 227.6 <0.001 <0.001 0.86
wt (kg), day 70 32.2 33.3 27.4 30.2 33.6 31.9 28.7 28.6 1.93 0.22 0.97 0.27
wt (kg), day 134 83.1 BC 82.3 BC 91.3 AC 85.2 ABC 87.2 ABC 79.5 B 95.2 B 82.8 BC 1.94 <0.001 0.83 0.35
ADFI (g/day) 2,025 BD 2,194 AD 2,033 AB 2,380 A 1,988 BD 1,851 BC 1,586 C 1,942 BCD 74.1 0.005 <0.001 0.005
ADG (g/day) 1,028 902 891 1,131 1,065 847 894 1,077 30.0 0.25 0.44 <0.001
FCE (g/g) 2.05 B 2.62 A 2.40 A 2.11 B 1.91 B 2.39 A 1.80 B 1.84 B 0.088 0.03 <0.001 <0.001
Salivary cortisol
concn (ng/ml)
1.76 1.34 0.176 0.06
a

Cortisol was measured only in ROI1 pigs on the day prior to slaughter.

b

ROI1, Republic of Ireland batch 1; ROI2, Republic of Ireland batch 2; NI, Northern Ireland; AT, Austria; wt, weight; ADFI, average daily feed intake; ADG, average daily gain; FCE, feed conversion efficiency.

c

Within each row, values that do not share a common letter are different (P ≤ 0.05).

d

Least-squares means and the pooled standard errors of the means (SEM) are presented.