Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 12;9:494. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00494

Table 2.

Comparison of pancreatic serous cystadenoma and mucinous cystadenoma using overlapping textural parameters selected by lasso method and random forest method.

Slice thickness Parameters Serous cystadenoma
(Mean ± standard deviation)
Mucinous cystadenoma
(Mean ± standard deviation)
p-value
2 mm GLRLM_ SRHGE 9618.45 ± 110.29 8994.58 ± 164.91 0.002
GLRLM_ GLNU 1708.81 ± 350.35 19224.34 ± 6939.86 0.022
GLRLM_RLNU 9022.23 ± 1774.52 64048.26 ± 23074.55 0.029
GLZLM_LZE 20934.36 ± 5788.32 62766.20 ± 20660.20 0.066
GLZLM_SZHGE 6492.92 ± 55.31 5880.79 ± 367.91 0.117
5 mm GLRLM_ GLNU 982.43 ± 201.15 10572.27 ± 3414.19 0.013
GLRLM_RLNU 4468.52 ± 982.31 32363.30 ± 10314.21 0.016
GLZLM_LZHGE 175851321.56 ± 49625896.38 1353775484.89 ± 482202975.93 0.027
GLZLM_ZLNU 208.25 ± 40.94 1120.54 ± 341.00 0.017

GLRLM, Gray level run length matrix; GLZLM, Gray level zone length matrix; SRHGE, Short-nun high gray-level emphasis; GLNU, Gray-level non-uniformity; RLNU, Run length non-uniformity; LZE, Long-zone emphasis; SZHGE, Short-zone high gray-level emphasis; LZHGE, Long-zone high gray-level emphasis; ZLNU, Zone length non-uniformity. The bold values indicate that the corresponding textural features of the two groups are significantly different.