Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 6;17(1):247–258. doi: 10.1007/s40201-019-00344-3

Table 6.

Comparison of maximum adsorption capacity of GO/TiO2/PSf membrane with different adsorbents

Adsorbent Herbicide Dosage (g/l) qmax (mg/g) ref.
Fe-humic acid Glyphosate 10 4.05 [31]
chitosan/alginate membranes Glyphosate 0.008 8.70 [32]
GO/TiO2/PSf membrane Glyphosate 1 26.59 This work
PANi/ZSM-5 Glyphosate NA 61.9 [33]
Alum sludge Glyphosate 5 113.6 [34]
Resin D301 Glyphosate 11.1 169.49 [35]
Modified activated carbon 2,4-D 4 0.688 [36]
magnetic ion exchange resin 2,4-D 1 NA [37]
GO/TiO2/PSf membrane 2,4-D 1 19.08 This work
Modified jute 2,4-D 10 37.5 [38]
PAN@carbon fibers 2,4-D 0.625 164.47 [39]
Magnetic GO/Mg3Al-OH 2,4-D 1 198.26 [40]
GO/TiO2/PSf membrane Butachlor 1 9.44 This work
Activated bentonite Butachlor 0.05 29.30 [41]
Organo-clays Trifluralin 25 <0.1 [42]
Activated carbon Trifluralin 50 0.684 [43]
GO/TiO2/PSf membrane Trifluralin 1 7.69 This work
PS-DVB copolymer resin Trifluralin NA 15.55 [44]
Chitosan Trifluralin 6 31.8 [45]