Skip to main content
. 2019 May 4;8:100404. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100404

Table 4.

Summary of findings for all 28 main models investigating impact of metric choice.

Metric Statistically significant difference (Q1 vs Q4)a
Substantive conclusiona
+ 0 Lrg+ Sml+ U+ Null U- Sml- Lrg-
Count 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0
Count/Area 2 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0
Count/Population 4 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0
Presence/Absence 4 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0
Relative 1 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0
Relative 2 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0
Relative 3 2 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0

Key: +/−: statistically significant positive/negative difference between quartile 1 (Q1) and quartile 4 (Q4). 0: no statistically significant difference between Q1 and Q4. B: broad. M: moderate. N: narrow. Lrg+/-: large positive/negative association . Sml+/-: small positive/negative association U+/-: ‘positive/negative U-shaped association .

a

Results are from 4 models for each exposure, which respectively corresponded to 2 buffer sizes (1,600 m and 800 m) and two outcomes (BMI and obesity).