Table 4.

Bivariate and multivariate results of a multilevel regression of HIV durable viral suppression on individual- and United Hospital Fund- (UHF-) level covariates in a sample of heterosexuals (N = 3,159) in New York City diagnosed with HIV between 2009–2013.

Variable	Bivariates		Multivariable model
	Relative Risk	P-value	Adjusted Relative Risk	P-value
UHF-level variables
% residents who were food distressed (ref = high)
Low <1.00	1.48	0.02	1.70	0.01
Medium 1.00-<5.00	1.35	0.07	1.36	0.07
% residents who were non-Hispanic Black (ref = high)
Low <5.00	1.36	0.002	1.05	0.65
Medium 5.00-<30.00	1.07	0.26	1.04	0.50
% residents who were 21–54 years old	1.00	0.83
Alcohol outlet density	1.19	0.11	0.80	0.17
Residential vacancy	1.00	0.20	1.00	0.37
Stops per resident (ref = high)
Low <0.04	0.99	0.92
Medium 0.04-<0.20	1.03	0.74
Stops without arrest per resident (ref = high)
Low <0.06	1.08	0.40	0.95	0.57
Medium 0.06-<0.22	0.98	0.81	0.97	0.69
UHF stabilityⱡ	1.00	0.80
UHF affluence₸	1.01	0.50
Neighborhood disadvantage†	0.98	0.28	0.98	0.23
Poor access to healthcare	0.97	0.96	0.96	0.94
Individual-level variables
Male (ref = Female)	0.84	0.008	0.82	0.002
Race/ethnicity (ref = Black)
Hispanic	1.23	0.0001	1.17	0.004
White	1.32	0.005	1.26	0.02
Foreign born	1.37	<.0001	1.24	<.0001
History of homelessness	0.59	0.01	0.62	0.02
Age at HIV diagnosis (ref = 40–49)
13–19	0.61	0.003	0.61	0.004
20–29	0.91	0.19	0.87	0.06
30–39	1.06	0.40	1.04	0.55
50–59	1.19	0.01	1.17	0.02
60+	1.12	0.22	1.04	0.66
Year of HIV diagnosis (ref = 2009)
2010	1.18	0.04	1.18	0.04
2011	1.39	<.0001	1.39	<.0001
2012	1.40	<.0001	1.40	<.0001
2013	1.71	<.0001	1.61	<.0001

^ⱡHigher values mean more stability.

^₸Higher values mean mote affluence.

^†Higher values mean more disadvantage.