Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 5;105(13):990–998. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-314155

Table 6.

Association between PA (measured in [1] walking, moderate and vigorous MET-min/week and [2] low vs moderate and high PA intensity) and maximal NC/C ratio

PA measurement method Model
Unadjusted Limited adjustment Full adjustment
Effect estimate 95% CI P value Effect estimate 95% CI P value Effect estimate 95% CI P value
Total walking MET-min/week 0.006 −0.024 to 0.037 0.68 0.005 −0.025 to 0.035 0.76 −0.007 −0.037 to 0.023 0.65
Total moderate MET-min/week 0.001 −0.033 to 0.035 0.95 0.002 −0.031 to 0.036 0.88 −0.018 −0.052 to 0.016 0.31
Total vigorous MET-min/week 0.016 −0.007 to 0.039 0.19 0.021 −0.001 to 0.044 0.06 0.006 −0.017 to 0.029 0.60
Low versus moderate categorical activity 0.045 −0.039 to 0.130 0.29 0.048 −0.035 to 0.131 0.26 0.022 −0.060 to 0.104 0.60
Low versus high categorical activity 0.009 −0.073 to 0.092 0.83 0.022 −0.058 to 0.104 0.58 −0.037 −0.119 to 0.046 0.39

Effect estimate reflects an NC/C ratio change per IQR MET-min/week.

MET, metabolic equivalent of task; NC/C, non-compaction/compaction; PA, physical activity.