Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 4;145(6):494–500. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2019.0269

Table 2. Bleeding Event Rate by Noninferiority mITT Analysisa.

Bleeding Event No. (%) of Patients % Difference (1-Sided 97.5% CI)b Noninferiority P Valuec
Ibuprofen (n = 345) Acetaminophen (n = 343)
Most Severe Bleeding Eventd
Type 1 16 (4.6) 14 (4.1) NA NA
Type 2 12 (3.5) 9 (2.6) NA NA
Type 3e 10 (2.9) 4 (1.2) 1.7 (3.8) .12
Total children with bleeding 38 (11.0) 27 (7.9) NA NA
Most Severe Secondary Bleeding Event (mITT Analysis)d
Type 1 16 (4.6) 12 (3.5) NA NA
Type 2 10 (2.9) 5 (1.5) NA NA
Type 3e 8 (2.3) 4 (1.2) 1.17 (3.1) .03
Total children with bleeding 34 (10.0) 21 (6.2) NA NA
Most Severe Bleeding Event Rate (per Protocol Analysis)d,f
Type 1 5 (3.4) 1 (0.8) NA NA
Type 2 4 (2.8) 3 (2.5) NA NA
Type 3e 2 (1.4) 2 (1.6) 0.26 (2.69) .02
Total children with bleeding 11 (7.6) 6 (4.9) NA NA

Abbreviations: mITT, modified intention-to-treat; NA, not applicable.

a

Noninferiority mITT analysis was performed only for type 3 bleeding.

b

Noninferiority is not achieved if the 1-sided 97.5% CI surpasses the noninferiority margin of 3%.

c

P values correspond to 1-sided CIs with noninferiority margin of 3.0%. P values <.025 are considered statistically significant.

d

The most severe type of bleeding event was included for children with multiple bleeding events.

e

Primary outcome measure.

f

Populations for these outcomes were 145 for ibuprofen and 122 for acetaminophen.