Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 18;5(1):13–17. doi: 10.1111/os.12026

Table 4.

Multiple comparisons with “LOCAL” as control variable

Dependent variable (I) Treatment (J) Treatment Mean difference (I‐J)a SE P value 95% Confidence
interval
Fusion rate rhBMP‐2 LOCAL 2.9074 0.5428 0.000 1.6161 4.1987
AUTO LOCAL 1.7084 0.4284 0.000 0.6893 2.7275
ALLO LOCAL −0.7812 0.4932 0.291 −1.9546 0.3921
ODI change rhBMP‐2 LOCAL −2.9200 0.6460 0.000 −4.45 −1.39
AUTO LOCAL −9.0720 0.4900 0.000 −10.24 −7.91
ALLO LOCAL −14.6920 0.4830 0.000 −15.84 −13.54
VAS change rhBMP‐2 LOCAL 0.8684 0.0767 0.000 0.6858 1.0509
AUTO LOCAL 0.2402 0.0557 0.000 0.1078 0.3726
ALLO LOCAL 0.5166 0.0539 0.000 0.3884 0.6449
a

Dunnett t test (2‐sided).