Skip to main content
. 2010 Apr 26;2(2):141–148. doi: 10.1111/j.1757-7861.2010.00081.x

Table 3.

Statistical analysis of differences between the affected and the contralateral unaffected arm

Range‐of‐movement measure Affected arm Unaffected arm P value (Kolmogorov‐Smirnov test) t value P value
Extension deficit 21.25 ± 11.88 0.63 ± 4.17 0.2363 5.74 0.0007
Flexion 126.88 ± 8.43 139.00 ± 2.07 0.0027 0.0078
Arc of motion 105.63 ± 20.08 138.38 ± 7.29 0.0610 0.0078
Pronation 71.25 ± 18.66 86.50 ± 2.20 0.0079 0.0156
Supination 75.00 ± 14.64 86.25 ± 2.6 0.0233 0.0313

Each data set was assessed with the Kolmogorov‐Smirnov test of normality to permit use of the t‐test. Where P < 0.1, the non‐parametric test was used, so there are no t‐test values in the last four rows.