Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 12;5(3):188–195. doi: 10.1111/os.12057

Table 4.

Comparison of clinical effects of the five procedure options

Groups Cases Blood loss (mean ± s.d., ml) Imperfect reduction (cases) Loss of reduction (cases) Failed fixation [cases (%]) Good and excellent rate of joint function (cases [%]) SF‐36 (mean ± s.d.)
Group 1 26 265.7 ± 125.0 2 5 6 (23.1), 20 (76.9) 75.8 ± 5.6
Group 2 27 373.7 ± 137.3* 0 1 1 (3.7) 25 (92.6) 85.5 ± 2.9*
Group 3 30 308.4 ± 120.5 1 1 1 (3.3) 28 (93.3) 86.2 ± 3.2*
Group 4 6 461.7 ± 90.4*, 0 0 0 (0) 6 (100) 87.3 ± 2.7*
Group 5 23 95.6 ± 31.6*, , § 3 6, 5 (21.7) 16 (69.6), 72.6 ± 6.3*, , , §
Statistical value 18.32 5.07 10.61 10.07 9.45 44.16
P value 0.00 0.28 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.00

*Comparison with Group 1, P < 0.05; †Comparison with Group 2, P < 0.05; ‡Comparison with Group 3, P < 0.05; §Comparison with Group 4, P < 0.05.