Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 1;6(3):187–195. doi: 10.1111/os.12114

Table 1.

Studies reporting MIS techniques for spinal metastatic disease: operative data, outcomes and complication rates19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32

Author No of patients MBL (mL) MOT (min) LOS (d) MNI (%) MPA (%) MCR (%)
Lin et al.22 25 1047 324 NA 76 68 4
Tancioni et al.23 (Prospective) 25 NA NA 6 88 96 12
Zairi et al.20 (Prospective) 10 400 170 6 100 100 10
Rosenthal et al.21 4 1450 390 7.5 100 100 0
Huang et al.25 41 (VAST) 775 190 NA NA NA 54
Huang et al.24 29 (MASS) 1100 179 70.8 24
Le Huec et al.28 2 350 156 NA 100 100 50
McLain et al.31 8 1677 360 6.5 100 100 0
Mobbs et al.26 1 100 100 0
Deutsch et al.34 8 227 132 4 62.5 62.5 0
Muhlbauer et al.29 5 1120 360 NA 100 100 0
Kan and Schmidt27 5 610 258 6.25 100 100 0
Payer and Sottas30 11 711 NA 91 NA 18
Taghva et al.32 1 1200 420 5 100 100 0

LOS, length of stay; MASS: minimal access spine surgery; MBL, mean blood loss; MCR, mean complication rate; MNI, median neurologic improvement; MOT, mean operating time; MPA: median pain alleviation rate; VAST, video‐assisted thoracosopic surgery.