Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 8;321(1):44–55. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.19791

Table 3. Clinical Outcomes by 1 Yeara.

Analysis No. of Events (%)b Unadjusted Adjusted
Intervention
(n = 6135)
Usual Care (n = 3967) Observed Difference, % (95% CI)c HR (95% CI) P Value Adjusted Difference, % (95% CI)c HR (95% CI) P Value
Primary Outcome (Death, MI, or Stroke)
MACE
Intention-to-treat 614 (10.2) 415 (10.6) −0.5 (−2.2 to 1.3) 0.96 (0.80 to 1.15) .65 0.7 (−0.7 to 2.1) 1.07 (0.93 to 1.25) .35
As-treated 327 (7.5) 415 (10.6) −3.0 (−4.6 to −1.5) 0.70 (0.58 to 0.84) <.001 −0.7 (−2.1 to 0.7) 0.90 (0.76 to 1.08) .25
Secondary Outcomes
Death
Intention-to-treat 237 (3.9) 154 (3.9) 0.0 (−1.0 to 1.0) 1.00 (0.76 to 1.31) .98 0.4 (−0.5 to 1.2) 1.11 (0.88 to 1.39) .39
As-treated 103 (2.3) 154 (3.9) −1.5 (−2.4 to −0.7) 0.60 (0.44 to 0.81) .001 −0.6 (−1.4 to 0.2) 0.82 (0.63 to 1.07) .14
Recurrent MI
Intention-to-treat 413 (6.9) 280 (7.3) −0.3 (−1.6 to 0.9) 0.96 (0.79 to 1.15) .64 0.5 (−0.7 to 1.6) 1.08 (0.90 to 1.29) .40
As-treated 235 (5.4) 280 (7.3) −1.7 (−2.9 to 0.6) 0.74 (0.61 to 0.90) .003 0.0 (−1.2 to 1.2) 0.98 (0.80 to 1.20) .83
Stroke
Intention-to-treat 33 (0.8) 19 (1.0) −0.1 (−0.5 to 0.2) 0.88 (0.59 to 1.31) .53 0.0 (−0.3 to 0.3) 0.98 (0.68 to 1.42) .91
As-treated 29 (0.7) 19 (1.0) −0.3 (−0.6 to 0.1) 0.71 (0.44 to 1.15) .16 −0.1 (−0.4 to 0.2) 0.86 (0.57 to 1.31) .48
Cardiovascular death
Intention-to-treat 187 (3.1) 117 (3.0) 0.1 (−0.8 to 1.0) 1.03 (0.77 to 1.38) .82 0.5 (−0.2 to 1.2) 1.18 (0.92 to 1.52) .19
As-treated 80 (1.8) 117 (3.0) −1.1 (−1.9 to −0.4) 0.61 (0.45 to 0.84) .003 −0.3 (−0.9 to 0.4) 0.89 (0.66 to 1.21) .46
BARC type 2 or higher bleeding
Intention-to-treat 259 (4.4) 157 (4.1) 0.3 (−0.6 to 1.2) 1.06 (0.87 to 1.30) .56 0.6 (−0.3 to 1.5) 1.15 (0.94 to 1.41) .17
As-treated 184 (4.3) 157 (4.1) 0.1 (−0.8 to 1.0) 1.00 (0.81 to 1.23) .95 0.6 (−0.3 to 1.5) 1.13 (0.91 to 1.40) .26

Abbreviations: BARC, Bleeding Academic Research Consortium; HR, hazard ratio; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular events; MI, myocardial infarction.

a

Primary analysis used an intention-to-treat approach in which outcomes were compared regardless of whether the intervention group patient used the study voucher. Prespecified secondary analyses of the as-treated population excluded intervention group patients who never used the study voucher during the 1 year after index MI discharge.

b

Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier event rates.

c

Negative differences denote better outcomes for patients in the intervention group.