Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 19;14(6):e0218518. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218518

Table 2. Fittings indices of configural invariance ESEM models with different factors (parent and teacher data).

Model χ2(df), p = RMSEA CFI NNFI Δχ2(Δdf), p = ΔCFI
Parent data (n = 216)
3-factor 1276.011(1047),0.000 .032 .941 .931
4-factor 1157.900(996), 0.000 .027 .958 .949 120.703(51),0.000 0.017
5-factor 1036.759(945), 0.020 .021 .976 .969 115.412(51),0.000 0.018
6-factor 954.825(894), 0.077 .018 .984 .979 87.032(51),0.001 0.008
7-factor 875.184(843), 0.215 .013 .992 .988 84.214(51),0.002 0.008
Teacher data (n = 189)
3-factor 1293.662(1047),0.000 .035 .954 .946
4-factor 1165.792(996), 0.000 .030 .968 .961 126.787(51),0.000 .014
5-factor 1037.104(945), 0.019 .023 .983 .978 120.284(51),0.000 .015
6-factor 959.046(894), 0.065 .020 .988 .983 79.623(51), 0.006 .005
7-factor 878.693(843), 0.191 .015 .993 .990 84.144(51), 0.002 .005

Note. RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation; CFI = comparative fit index; NNFI = non-normal fit index. N = number of participants with at least one completed baseline or follow-up measure