Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 19;14(6):e0218325. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218325

Table 1. Comparison of different methods for the detection of S. Typhimurium.

Methods Linear range (cfu·mL-1) LOD (cfu·mL-1) Recognition element Reference
DNA-assembled gold nanodimers 102−107 35 Aptamer [25]
Microfluidic nanobiosensor 103−106 103 Polyclonal antibodies [26]
Graphene oxide platform 103−108 100 Aptamer [27]
F0F1-ATPase biosensor 101−104 10 Aptamer [28]
IMS-PMA-mPCR 101−107 10 Polyclonal antibody [29]
Immunomagnetic nanoparticle-based quantitative PCR 103−105 103 Antibody [30]
ELISA 103−108 103 Gold nanoparticle-based enzyme-linked antibody-aptamer sandwich [31]
Surface-enhanced Raman scattering 103−106 103 Antibody [32]
Digital PCR 2.5×102−2.5×106 2.5×102 Specific nucleic acid [33]
Aptamer modified magnetic nanoparticles 10−1010 1 Aptamer This study