Table 1. Comparison of different methods for the detection of S. Typhimurium.
Methods | Linear range (cfu·mL-1) | LOD (cfu·mL-1) | Recognition element | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
DNA-assembled gold nanodimers | 102−107 | 35 | Aptamer | [25] |
Microfluidic nanobiosensor | 103−106 | 103 | Polyclonal antibodies | [26] |
Graphene oxide platform | 103−108 | 100 | Aptamer | [27] |
F0F1-ATPase biosensor | 101−104 | 10 | Aptamer | [28] |
IMS-PMA-mPCR | 101−107 | 10 | Polyclonal antibody | [29] |
Immunomagnetic nanoparticle-based quantitative PCR | 103−105 | 103 | Antibody | [30] |
ELISA | 103−108 | 103 | Gold nanoparticle-based enzyme-linked antibody-aptamer sandwich | [31] |
Surface-enhanced Raman scattering | 103−106 | 103 | Antibody | [32] |
Digital PCR | 2.5×102−2.5×106 | 2.5×102 | Specific nucleic acid | [33] |
Aptamer modified magnetic nanoparticles | 10−1010 | 1 | Aptamer | This study |