Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 13;10:412. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00412

Table 3.

Comparisons of Rorschach Comprehensive System (CS) variables between HK patients and non-HK patients.

Cluster Variable name HK patients
(N = 22)
Non-HK patients
(N = 18)
U Z p-value
Mean Median SD Mean Median SD
Affect FC 2.50 2.50 1.68 1.39 2.00 1.14 123 −2.1 0.037*
CF + C 2.50 2.00 2.43 2.17 2.00 1.92 183 −0.4 0.68
pureC 0.41 0.00 0.96 0.50 0.00 1.04 182 −0.6 0.55
SumC' 1.55 1.00 1.77 1.67 1.00 1.33 168.5 −0.8 0.41
WSumC 3.95 3.75 2.89 3.11 3.00 2.33 161 −1.0 0.31
Afr 0.51 0.46 0.16 0.47 0.40 0.21 162 −1.0 0.33
S 3.18 3.00 2.44 2.89 3.00 1.71 194 −0.1 0.91
Blends 3.14 2.50 2.32 2.61 2.50 1.54 183 −0.4 0.68
R 24.91 23.50 8.48 24.67 22.50 6.21 191.5 −0.2 0.86
CP 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 198 0 1
Interpersonal perception and behavior COP 0.27 0.00 0.55 0.61 0.00 0.92 161.5 −1.2 0.29
AG 0.45 0.00 1.14 0.44 0.00 0.51 163 −1.2 0.25
GHR 2.91 3.00 1.97 4.33 3.00 3.24 149 −1.4 0.18
PHR 2.73 3.00 1.80 1.83 2.00 0.99 138 −1.7 0.09
a 2.64 2.00 2.82 3.50 2.50 3.38 170 −0.8 0.44
p 4.32 4.00 2.59 3.78 4.00 2.10 180 −0.5 0.62
Food 0.82 1.00 0.85 1.11 1.00 0.76 154 −1.3 0.19
SumT 0.50 0.00 0.67 0.11 0.00 0.32 137 −2.1 0.033*
Human content 5.73 6.00 2.60 5.94 4.50 3.73 192.5 −0.2 0.88
pureH 2.09 2.00 1.51 2.50 2.00 2.60 195.5 −0.1 0.95
PER 1.09 0.00 2.41 1.06 0.50 1.73 182 −0.5 0.63
Isolation 0.13 0.12 0.10 0.14 0.12 0.10 189.5 −0.3 0.82

Statistical p-values were derived from Mann–Whitney U test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.

FC, Form Color Response; CF+C, Color Form Response + Pure Color Response; SumC', Sum of Achromatic Color Determinants; WSumC, Weighted Sum of Chromatic Determinants; Afr, Affective Ratio; S, White Space Details; R, Response; CP, Color Projection; COP, Coorporative Movement; AG, Aggressive Movement; GHR, Good Human Representation; PHR, Poor Human Representation; a, active; p, passive; PER, Personalized answer.